Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Erratum for Calderoni et al., BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 95 (6) 2342-2363.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2006; v. 96; no. 3; p. 1199; DOI: 10.1785/0120060046
© 2006 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calderoni, G.
Right arrow Articles by Di Giulio, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Erratum

Assessment of Ground Motion in Palermo, Italy, during the 6 September 2002 Mw 5.9 Earthquake Using Source Scaling Law

Giovanna Calderoni1, Antonio Rovelli1, Giovanna Cultrera1, Riccardo M. Azzara1 and Giuseppe Di Giulio1

1 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia
Via di Vigna Murata 605
00143 Rome, Italy

In Calderoni et al., 2005, a section of text that was present in the original manuscript was inadvertently deleted during composition. The section entitled "Random Summation of Aftershocks (RNDS)" is printed correctly below.


    Random Summation of Aftershocks (RNDS)
 Top
 Random Summation of Aftershocks...
 References
 
RNDS (Joyner and Boore, 1986) generates synthetic seismograms of the target earthquake at a generic station (STAT) through the following equation:


Formula 001

(13)
where Formula is the ground-velocity time history of a colocated subevent recorded at the same station. Time histories were preprocessed similarly to the ESR technique and randomly added with a shift time {tau}j uniformly distributed between 0 and source duration T. According to Joyner and Boore (1986), the scaling factor w and the total number N in summation (13) are obtained through the ratios of the seismic moments of the two events


Formula 003

(14)


Formula 004

(15)
under the assumption of an omega-square model with constant stress drop. The value of the mainshock duration T was fixed at 5 sec.

We tested the prediction suitability of this method by comparing the mainshock recording of TORT with simulations derived through (13) using the same aftershocks (nos. 96, 97, and 113) selected in the test of the preceding method. Figure 10a indicates that for events 96 and 97 the synthetic waveforms reproduce the real recordings with a satisfactory agreement in terms of amplitude and durations. Event 113 underestimates amplitudes by a factor of 2, approximately, which is still acceptable in the practice of ground-motion prediction.

Manuscript received March 3, 2006


    References
 Top
 Random Summation of Aftershocks...
 References
 

Calderoni, G., A. Rovelli, G. Cultrera, R. M. Azzara, and G. Di Giulio (2005). Assessment of ground motion in Palermo, Italy, during the 6 September 2002 Mw 5.9 earthquake using source scaling law, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.95 ,2342 –2363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Joyner, W. B., and D. M. Boore (1986). On simulating large earthquakes by Green’s function addition of smaller earthquakes, in Earthquake Source Mechanics, S. Das, J. Boatwright, and C. H. Sholtz (Editors), American Geophysical Monograph 37,269 –274.





This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calderoni, G.
Right arrow Articles by Di Giulio, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS