Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Erratum for Frankel et al., BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 89 (2) 468-483.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2001; v. 91; no. 2; p. 404; DOI: 10.1785/0120000302
© 2001 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frankel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Overturf, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Errata

Site Response for Seattle and Source Parameters of Earthquakes in the Puget Sound Region

Arthur Frankel, David Carver, Edward Cranswick, Mark Meremonte, Thomas Bice and Dee Overturf

U.S. Geological Survey
MS 966, Box 25046
DFC
Denver, Colorado, 80225

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 89, No. 2, pp. 468–483, April 1999

In Frankel et al. (1999), we incorrectly described part of the shear-wave velocity (Vs) profile used to calculate the predicted spectra at site KD1 near the Kingdome in Seattle (figure 7 of Frankel et al., 1999). The shear-wave velocity profile we used was partially determined from a seismic refraction/reflection survey reported by Williams et al. (1999) at sites KD1 and KD2. The velocity of the stiff deposits underlying the fill was taken from a borehole measurement at a nearby location (Shannon and Wilson, unpublished report, 1994). The shear-wave velocity profile consisted of a 19-m-thick layer of fill and recent alluvium with Vs of 145 m/sec over a 1.1-km-thick layer of stiff Pleistocene deposits, with Vs of 579 m/sec over a half-space, with Vs of 1.0 km/sec (bedrock). The thickness of the top layer was determined by Williams et al. (1999) from the timing of a strong shear-wave reflection observed in their survey and the velocity of the initial S-wave arrival. This reflection is from the interface between the overlying artificial fill and the stiff soil unit beneath. As reported in Williams et al. (1999), the two-way travel time observed from the reflection survey (0.265 sec) is consistent with the 2 Hz resonance observed in the earthquake data by Frankel et al. (1999). The error in our description of the profile does not affect the results reported in our article.


    References
 Top
 References
 

Frankel, A., D. Carver, E. Cranswick, M. Meremonte, T. Bice, and D. Overturf (1999). Site response for Seattle and source parameters of earthquakes in the Puget Sound region, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89,468 –483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shannon and Wilson (1994). Kingdome seismic evaluation, Seattle, Washington. Report W-6836-01, Seattle, Washington, unpublished report.

Williams, R. A., W. J. Stephenson, A. D. Frankel, and J. K. Odum (1999). Surface seismic measurements of near-surface P- and S-wave seismic velocities at earthquake recording stations, Seattle, Washington, Earthquake Spectra 15,565 –584.[CrossRef]





This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frankel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Overturf, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS