Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2008; v. 98; no. 2; p. 817-822; DOI: 10.1785/0120060401
© 2008 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aagaard, B. T.
Right arrow Articles by Beroza, G. C.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Special Section: The 1906 Earthquake a Century Later

The 1906 San Francisco Earthquake a Century Later: Introduction to the Special Section

Brad T. Aagaard

U.S. Geological Survey, MS977, 345 Middlefield Rd., Menlo Park, California 94025

Gregory C. Beroza

Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, 397 Panama Mall, Stanford, California 94305-2215

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The great 1906 San Francisco earthquake is perhaps the landmark event in the history of earthquake science. It began with a foreshock at 5:12 a.m. local time in the morning of 18 April 1906. Some 30 sec later, the main event initiated on the San Andreas fault, just off the San Francisco coast (Lawson, 1908). Within 90 sec, nearly 480 km of the San Andreas fault ruptured (see Fig. 1), extending south to the northern end of the creeping section near San Juan Bautista and north to the terminus of the fault at the triple junction near Cape Mendocino (Song et al., 2008). As it ruptured, it generated powerful seismic waves over the entire rupture length and set in motion a chain of events that led to the destruction of most of San Francisco, the largest city of the western United States at the time. The earthquake occurred in the early days of instrumental seismology, which renders the data difficult to analyze, but our best estimate is that the moment magnitude was 7.9 (Song et al., 2008), about 26 times the size of the 1989 magnitude 6.9 Loma Prieta earthquake as measured by seismic moment (Hanks and Krawinkler, 1991; Song et al., 2008).


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (86K):



  		Figure 1. The thick dark line shows the extent of rupture along the San Andreas fault in the 1906 earthquake, and the star denotes the epicenter.

 
The strong shaking caused widespread damage along the entire length of the rupture (see Figs. 2Go–4). Masonry walls were reduced to rubble, houses were knocked off their foundations, chimneys fell down, and pipes were severed (Lawson, 1908). Ground failures in the form of landslides and liquefaction were also prevalent, especially in the man-made fill along the San Francisco waterfront (Lawson, 1908. . . [Full Text of this Article]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Seismological Society of America.