Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2005; v. 95; no. 2; p. 770-773; DOI: 10.1785/0120040106
© 2005 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bielak, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Reply

Reply to "Comment on ‘Domain Reduction Method for Three-Dimensional Earthquake Modeling in Localized Regions, Part I: Theory,’ by J. Bielak, K. Loukakis, Y. Hisada, and C. Yoshimura, and ‘Part II: Verification and Applications,’ by C. Yoshimura, J. Bielak, Y. Hisada, and A. Fernández," by E. Faccioli, M. Vanini, R. Paolucci, and M. Stupazzini

Jacobo Bielak1

1 Computational Seismology Laboratory
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
 (J.B.)

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

We thank Faccioli, Vanini, Paolucci, and Stupazzini for their interest in our articles (Bielak et al., 2003; Yoshimura et al., 2003; hereafter I and II). We will refer to their comments (Faccioli et al., 2004) as FVPS. The primary aim of FVPS is (1) to illustrate the implementation by FVPS of the domain reduction method (DRM) described in I and II for the hybrid finite-element–spectral-element (FESE) method, and (2) to show that the use of SEs can lead to dramatic reduction in computer processing unit (CPU) time and storage requirements, without loss of accuracy, with respect to the traditional FEs used in II. We will show (1) that since the FESE method is a particular case of the FE method (FEM), the DRM described in I and II, and in our earlier work (Loukakis, 1988; Loukakis and Bielak, 1994), provides the complete theoretical framework needed for the application of the DRM to FESEs, and, thus, the section titled "Method" in FVPS is essentially redundant; and (2) that while SEs are ideally suited for problems in which the exact solution is smooth within every SE, the advantages of the SE method (SEM) over other methods for problems that exhibit discontinuities and singularities is far from having been demonstrated. To our knowledge, there is no evidence thus far that the SEM is superior to the FEM for every possible wave propagation problem in elastodynamics, since each method has its advantages and disadvantages. We will argue that, in fact, the more traditional FEM has important advantages over the particular SEM implementation by FVPS, and that, most likely, it is more efficient . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related articles in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America:

Domain Reduction Method for Three-Dimensional Earthquake Modeling in Localized Regions, Part I: Theory
Jacobo Bielak, Kostas Loukakis, Yoshiaki Hisada, and Chiaki Yoshimura
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2003 93: 817-824. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Domain Reduction Method for Three-Dimensional Earthquake Modeling in Localized Regions, Part II: Verification and Applications
Chiaki Yoshimura, Jacobo Bielak, Yoshiaki Hisada, and Antonio Fernández
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2003 93: 825-841. [Abstract] [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Seismological Society of America.