Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2003; v. 93; no. 2;
p. 969-972; DOI: 10.1785/0120020104
© 2003 Seismological Society of America
Reply to "Comment on `A Vertical Exposure of the 1999 Surface Rupture of the Chelungpu Fault at Wufeng, Western Taiwan: Structural and Paleoseismic Implications for an Active Thrust Fault,' by Jian-Cheng Lee, Yue-Gau Chen, Kerry Sieh, Karl Mueller, Wen-Shan Chen, Hao-Tsu Chu, Yu-Chang Chan, Charles Rubin, and Robert Yeats," by Yuan-Hsi Lee, Shih-Ting Lu, Tung-Sheng Shih, and Wei-Yu Wu
Jian-Cheng Lee,
Charles Rubin,
Karl Mueller,
Yu-Chang Chan,
Hao-Tsu Chu,
Yue-Gau Chen,
Kerry Sieh,
Wen-Shan Chen and
Robert Yeats
Institute of Earth Sciences
Academia Sinica
P.O. Box
1-55
Nankang, Taipei, R.O.C., Taiwan
(J.-C.L., Y.-C.C.)
Department of Geology
Central Washington
University
Ellensberg, Washington
(C.R.)
Department of Geology
University of Colorado
Boulder,
Colorado
(K.M.)
Central Geological Survey
P.O. Box 968
Taipei, R.O.C.,
Taiwan
(H.-T.C.)
Department of Geology
National Taiwan University
Taipei,
R.O.C., Taiwan
(Y.-G.C., W.-S.C.)
Division of Geological and Planetary
Sciences
100-23
Caltech
Pasadena, California
(K.S.)
Department of Geosciences
Orgon State
University
Corvallis, Oregon
(R.Y.)
| The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
We welcome Y. H. Lee et al.'s interest in our article
(Lee et al., 2001). We
thank them for their comment, which provides a further opportunity for
discussing the quantification of the slip amounts including horizontal and
vertical components and the fault geometry for an earthquake thrust scarp in
Wufeng, western Taiwan, during the 1999 M 7.6 earthquake.
In their comment, Y. H. Lee et al. used restoration of deformed
concrete fence across the 1999 scarp to estimate the slip vector of the main
fault. The estimated slip amount, especially the horizontal component, is
different (significantly less) from our results presented in the 2001 BSSA
article. They then applied an "area-balance" technique to compare
their results with ours. They showed that their area-balance method favored
their estimates including the slip amounts and the fault dip angle. They
concluded that their estimated slip amounts are more reasonable than ours.
The fundamental questions in this issue, in our opinions, include the
actual amounts of deformation (slip) and the associated deformation processes,
as well as the limitation and uncertainty of the applied techniques on an
earthquake-formed thrust scarp. Hereafter we attempt to answer these questions
and clarify the related problems.
 |
Uncertainty of the Estimates
|
|---|
First, we shall discuss the techniques of the estimates of the horizontal
shortening used for Y. H. Lee et al. and for our previous article. It
is important to know the limitations, the uncertainties, and the possible
sources of errors for any estimate or calculation of the deformation, which
enables us to evaluate the results. For our line-balancing method in the
previous article, the uncertainties come mainly from the complicated
deformation near the main fault zone, for instance, the overlapped structures
and the ductile deformation. In particular, stretching and thinning of the
sedimentary layers can be clearly observed around . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 |
Another Area-Balancing Estimate
|
|---|
 |
Comparison with the Neighbor Site
|
|---|
 |
Further Discussion
|
|---|
Copyright © 2003 by the Seismological Society of America.