|
|
||||||||
Comment and Reply |
Physics Department
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby,
British Columbia
V5A 1S6, Canada
(D.J.H.)
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
The chronology given in this comment depends primarily on thermoluminescence and optical ages obtained for several samples. I present, in this comment, evidence that the samples dated are considerably older than the ages presented. The optical ages quoted in the article were obtained from data from my laboratory, but the presentation was incomplete. The authors have chosen not to include the information that severe anomalous fading was observed for the two samples for which measurements were made, and the optical ages should consequently have been presented as lower limits.
In either thermoluminescence dating or optical dating, one measures the
luminescence from selected mineral grains of the sample, compares it with the
luminescence arising from laboratory irradiation, and thus determines the past
radiation dose and hence age. Ideally, the intensity of the luminescence
arising from the laboratory irradiation, after the required heat treatment,
should not depend on the length of time elapsed between irradiation and
measurement. If this is not the case, but the intensity decreases as a
function of this time, there is said to occur anomalous fading. It is called
anomalous because it was, and to some extent is still, not understood. This
phenomenon does not seem to occur in quartz, but it does occur in feldspars.
It
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |