Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 2009; v. 99; no. 5; p. 2912-2926; DOI: 10.1785/0120090014
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tada, T.
Right arrow Articles by Shinozaki, Y.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

New Circular-Array Microtremor Techniques to Infer Love-Wave Phase Velocities

Taku Tada and Ikuo Cho

Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba Central 7, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8567, Japan kogutek{at}ni.aist.go.jp

Yuzo Shinozaki

Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, 1-14-6 Kudan Kita, Chiyoda-ku, 102-0073 Tokyo, Japan

We present simple and novel formulas that help to directly infer phase velocities of Love waves (cL) using two-component, horizontal-motion, circular-array records of microtremors. Our formulas are analogous to those of the spatial autocorrelation (SPAC) method, a technique of microtremor exploration that is popularly used to infer phase velocities of Rayleigh waves (cR). Although the existing theory of the SPAC method does provide the possibility to estimate cL, this can only be done by solving a nonlinear system of equations, wherein the unknowns to be solved for also include cR and the Rayleigh-to-Love power partition ratios. By contrast, cL is the only unknown to appear in our formulas.

The field applicability of the cL estimation methods based on the proposed formulas—which we name the SPAC+L, SPAC-L, and CCA-L (where CCA stands for centerless circular array) methods—is demonstrated by analysis results for two test sites. Among the three techniques proposed, the SPAC+L method distinguished itself as the best-performing. The valid wavelength ranges of the three methods had lower limits in the area of 2–5 times the array radius r and upper limits in the area of 10–25r.

Similar circular-array microtremor techniques that involve cL alone were proposed in recent years, but the methods we present here are either logistically less expensive or mathematically simpler than any of them.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Seismological Society of America.