HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Langston, C. A. Articles by Horton, S. GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Array Observations of Microseismic Noise and the Nature of H/V in the Mississippi Embayment

Center for Earthquake Research and Information, University of Memphis, 3876 Central Ave., Suite 1 Memphis, Tennessee 38152 clangstn{at}memphis.edu

Paul Bodin

Pacific Northwest Seismic Network Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Johnson Hall 070, Box 351310, 4000 15th Avenue NE Seattle, Washington 98195-1310

Stephen Horton

Center for Earthquake Research and Information, University of Memphis, 3876 Central Ave., Suite 1 Memphis, Tennessee 38152

Ambient ground-motion data were collected using phased seismic arrays in fall 2002 and spring 2007 within the Mississippi embayment and at a single station external to the embayment. These data allowed us to determine the wave-field composition of ambient noise for understanding wave-propagation mechanisms giving rise to spectral peaks using Nakamura’s H/V technique. Ambient ground motions in the frequency band of 0.1–0.33 Hz (10–3 sec period) were dominated by spatially localized Rayleigh- and Love-wave microseisms generated by high-ocean waves along the North American seaboard in the time periods of analysis. Seismic waves important in forming the H/V peak near 4 sec period are composed of relatively high-phase velocity Rayleigh and Love waves that convert to propagating homogeneous shear waves in the thick unconsolidated sediments of the embayment. The H/V resonant period is controlled by both constructive and destructive interference of these shear waves. A simple relationship for the H/V peak is given using a propagator matrix formulation that predicts the resonance frequency of a layered medium for surface wave motion at the base of the system. The amplitude of the observed H/V peak, however, does not give an accurate estimate of shear-wave amplification because it depends on the slowness of the incident wave. The inconsistency in estimated average shear-wave velocities using the H/V method and differential travel times of local earthquake Sp phases in the Mississippi embayment may be explained by misidentification of Sp-wave conversion points from deeper interfaces.