Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2009; v. 99; no. 3; p. 1906-1920; DOI: 10.1785/0120080019
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Electronic Supplement
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diehl, T.
Right arrow Articles by Husen, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Automatic S-Wave Picker for Local Earthquake Tomography

T. Diehl*

Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland tdiehl{at}ldeo.columbia.edu

N. Deichmann

Swiss Seismological Service, ETH Zurich, Switzerland

E. Kissling

Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland

S. Husen

Swiss Seismological Service, ETH Zurich, Switzerland

* Present address: Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964

Online Material: Details on the proposed automatic S-wave picking algorithm.

High-resolution seismic tomography at local and regional scales requires large and consistent sets of arrival-time data. Algorithms combining accurate picking with an automated quality classification can be used for repicking waveforms and compiling large arrival-time data sets suitable for tomographic inversion. S-wave velocities represent a key parameter for petrological interpretation, improved hypocenter determination, as well as for seismic hazard models. In our approach, we combine three commonly used phase detection and picking methods in a robust S-wave picking procedure. Information from the different techniques provides an in situ estimate of timing uncertainty and of the reliability of the automatic phase identification. Automatic picks are compared against manually picked reference picks of selected earthquakes in the Alpine region. The average accuracy of automatic picks and their classification is comparable with the reference picks, although a higher number of picks is downgraded to lower quality classes by the automatic picker. In the production-mode, we apply the picker to a data set of 552 earthquakes in the Alps recorded at epicentral distances ≤150 km. The resulting data set includes about 2500 S phases with an upper error bound of 0.27 sec.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Seismological Society of America.