Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; May 2009; v. 99; no. 2B; p. 1261-1270; DOI: 10.1785/0120080196
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ghayamghamian, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tobita, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The Effect of Torsional Ground Motion on Structural Response: Code Recommendation for Accidental Eccentricity

M. Reza Ghayamghamian

International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), P.O. Box 19395-3913, Tehran, Iran mrgh{at}iiees.ac.ir

G. Reza Nouri

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran r.nouri{at}iiees.ac.ir

Heiner Igel

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Section Geophysics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munchen, Germany

Tetsuo Tobita

Disaster Prevention Research Institute (DPRI), Kyoto University, Japan

In this article, data were collected from the Chiba dense array, which consists of 44 accelerometers with interstation spacing in the range of 5–300 m that are employed to estimate the torsional ground motion. The geodetic method was used to estimate torsional motions from the translational records in the Chiba dense array. The translational and computed torsional motions were then applied to the building models with different structural characteristics to evaluate the effectiveness of the accidental eccentricity levels proposed in various design codes. The results of analysis suggest that the 5% accidental eccentricity is on the safe side for most periods of interest in engineering practice. However, in the case of stiff structures (with periods shorter than 0.3 sec), an increase of up to four times in building displacement is observed by including the torsional excitation. Furthermore, we found that the accidental eccentricity coefficient increased up to 0.6 at periods shorter than 0.3 sec, which is 12 times larger than what is proposed by the codes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. H. K Lee, M. Celebi, M. I. Todorovska, and H. Igel
Introduction to the Special Issue on Rotational Seismology and Engineering Applications
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2009; 99(2B): 945 - 957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Seismological Society of America.