Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2009; v. 99; no. 2A; p. 906-913; DOI: 10.1785/0120080213
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Short Notes

An Upper Bound on Rg to Lg Scattering Using Modal Energy Conservation

Jeffry L. Stevens, Heming Xu, and G. Eli Baker

Science Applications International Corporation , 10260 Campus Point Drive, San Diego, California 92121 Jeffry.L.Stevens{at}saic.com Heming.Xu{at}saic.com Glenn.E.Baker{at}saic.com

We use conservation of energy to place an upper bound on Lg generated by explosions through Rg scattering. We assume that all energy in Rg scatters very rapidly into the higher mode surface waves that make up Lg. We consider Rg generated directly by the explosion source and by a collocated but possibly shallower compensated linear vector dipole (CLVD) source. Rg scattering may be a viable mechanism for generating Lg at low frequencies (<1 Hz), but at higher frequencies Lg generated directly by the CLVD or explosion source is comparable to or greater than the upper bound on Lg generated by Rg scattering. For shallow sources at frequencies up to 2–3 Hz the direct CLVD waves may be smaller than the direct explosion or the upper bound limit on the scattered waves. Either the direct waves or scattering from the spherical explosion Rg will dominate over scattering from the CLVD generated Rg at all frequencies.


Related articles in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America:

Comment on "An Upper Bound on Rg to Lg Scattering Using Modal Energy Conservation" by Jeffry L. Stevens, Heming Xu, and G. Eli Baker
Howard J. Patton and Indra N. Gupta
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2010 100: 408-415. [Extract] [Full Text]  

Reply to "Comment on ‘An Upper Bound on Rg to Lg Scattering Using Modal Energy Conservation’ by Jeffry L. Stevens, Heming Xu, and G. Eli Baker" by Howard Patton and Indra N. Gupta
Jeffry L. Stevens, Heming Xu, and G. Eli Baker
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2010 100: 416-421. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. J. Patton and I. N. Gupta
Comment on "An Upper Bound on Rg to Lg Scattering Using Modal Energy Conservation" by Jeffry L. Stevens, Heming Xu, and G. Eli Baker
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2010; 100(1): 408 - 415.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. L. Stevens, H. Xu, and G. E. Baker
Reply to "Comment on 'An Upper Bound on Rg to Lg Scattering Using Modal Energy Conservation' by Jeffry L. Stevens, Heming Xu, and G. Eli Baker" by Howard Patton and Indra N. Gupta
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2010; 100(1): 416 - 421.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Seismological Society of America.