Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2009; v. 99; no. 2A; p. 794-808; DOI: 10.1785/0120080014
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Regional Multistation Discriminants: Magnitude, Distance, and Amplitude Corrections, and Sources of Error

D. N. Anderson*

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, MS K8-07, Richland, Washington 99352 dand{at}lanl.gov

W. R. Walter

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave., Livermore, California 94550

D. K. Fagan and T. M. Mercier

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 902 Battelle Blvd., Richland, Washington 99352

S. R. Taylor

Rocky Mountain Geophysics, LLC, 128 Piedra Loop, White Rock, New Mexico 87544

* Now at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Geophysics Group, P.O. Box 1663, MS F665, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545.

Magnitude, distance, and amplitude corrections (MDAC) made to observed regional amplitudes are necessary so that what remains in the corrected amplitude is mostly information about the seismic source type. Corrected amplitudes can be used in ratios to discriminate between earthquakes and explosions. However, source effects remain that cannot easily be determined and applied as amplitude corrections, such as those due to depth, focal mechanism, local material property, and apparent stress variability. We develop a mathematical model to capture these near-source effects as random (unknown), giving an error partition of three sources: model inadequacy, station noise, and amplitude correlation. This mathematical model is the basis for a general multistation regional discriminant formulation. The standard error of the discriminant includes the variances of model inadequacy and station noise, along with amplitude correlation in its formulation. The developed methods are demonstrated for a collection of Nevada test site (NTS) events observed at regional stations (see Fig. 1). Importantly, the proposed formulation includes all corrected amplitude information through the construction of multistation discriminants. In contrast, previous studies have only computed discriminants from single stations having both P and S amplitudes. The proposed multistation approach has similarities to the well-established mb versus Ms discriminant and represents a new paradigm for the regional discrimination problem.


Figure 1
Figure 1
View larger version (180K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Maps of NTS events observed at regional distances by stations KNB, ELK, LAC, and CMB. Explosions are red and earthquakes are yellow.

 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Seismological Society of America.