Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 2009; v. 99; no. 1; p. 449-453; DOI: 10.1785/0120080180
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arrowsmith, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hayward, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Short Notes

The F-Detector Revisited: An Improved Strategy for Signal Detection at Seismic and Infrasound Arrays

Stephen J. Arrowsmith and Rod Whitaker

EES-17, Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545

Charles Katz

Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), 10260 Campus Point Drive, San Diego, California 92121-1578

Chris Hayward

Department of Geological Sciences, Dedman College, Southern Methodist University, P.O. Box 750395, Dallas, Texas 75275

This short article explores and extends the adaptive detection algorithm recently developed by Arrowsmith, Whitaker, et al. (2008). In particular, this article highlights its application for seismic data, compares results for colocated seismic and infrasonic data, and assesses detector performance through comparison with analyst picks. We assess the adaptive detector by generating receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, illustrating the trade-off between detection probability and false-alarm probability, and comparing the results with the conventional F-detector. The results show that the adaptive detector performs much better than the conventional detector for both seismic and infrasound data by maintaining high detection probabilities while significantly decreasing false-alarm probabilities, illustrating that correlated noise is ubiquitous for both types of data. The effect of the adaptation window is illustrated and shown to be especially important for infrasound data where diurnal variations in ambient noise levels are pronounced. A window choice of 1 hr (i.e., significantly less than 24 hr) is shown to be adequate for representing variations in ambient noise levels.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Seismological Society of America.