Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 2009; v. 99; no. 1; p. 435-440; DOI: 10.1785/0120080012
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sugaya, K.
Right arrow Articles by Katao, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Short Notes

Coseismic Change and Recovery of Scattering Environment in the Crust after the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu Earthquake, Japan

Katsunori Sugaya

Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa, 920-1192, Japan

Yoshihiro Hiramatsu

School of Natural System, College of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa, 920-1192, Japan

Muneyoshi Furumoto

Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8601, Japan

Hiroshi Katao

Research Center for Earthquake Prediction, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Gokasyo, Uji, 611-0011, Japan

We observe a unique temporal variation in crustal heterogeneity from the analysis of coda Q-1 for 14 years in the Tamba region, northeast to the rupture zone of the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake (MJMA 7.3) in southwest Japan. The values of Formula at lower frequencies (1.5–4.0 Hz) that increased coseismically due to the static stress change decreased back to the preevent values in about two years. No such variations are found at higher frequencies (5.0–24.0 Hz). We confirm that no tectonic events that cause a significant stress change occurred during the recovery period. The time required for the recovery of the scattering environment observed here, such as the number density of cracks and cracks opened by the stress change, is consistent with those of previous studies focused on the brittle shallower crust. This suggests a possibility that a similar mechanism of the recovery operates in both the brittle and the ductile parts of the crust.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Seismological Society of America.