Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 2008; v. 98; no. 6; p. 2739-2745; DOI: 10.1785/0120080144
© 2008 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamada, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ide, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Limitation of the Predominant-Period Estimator for Earthquake Early Warning and the Initial Rupture of Earthquakes

Takuji Yamada* and Satoshi Ide

Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan ide{at}eps.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp

* Present address: U.S. Geological Survey, Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, P.O. Box 51, 1 Crater Rim Road, Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, Hawaii 96718; tyamada@usgs.gov.

We investigate the characteristics and limitations of the parameter {tau}p(t), which represents the predominant period of the P wave. We analyze the effects of the length of the time window (TW), low-pass filter, and anelastic attenuation as well as the complexity of the source process to elucidate whether values of Formula , or the time-dependent maximum value of {tau}p(t), have direct relationships to the physical quantities of earthquakes. We find that values of Formula have upper and lower limits. For larger earthquakes with source durations longer than the TW, the values of Formula have an upper limit that depends on the TW. On the other hand, the values for smaller earthquakes have a lower limit that is proportional to the sampling interval. For intermediate earthquakes, the values of Formula are close to their typical source durations and can have a large variety due to the complexity of the source process. These two limits and the slope for intermediate earthquakes yield an apparent final size dependence of Formula in a wide magnitude range. As a result, the dependence of Formula on the final size of earthquakes does not suggest that the final size of an earthquake is controlled by processes in the initial part of rupture. It is impossible to conclude whether the earthquake is deterministic or not from the dependence of Formula on the final size of earthquakes. This is because Formula does not always have a direct relation to the physical quantities of earthquakes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
R. M. Allen, P. Gasparini, O. Kamigaichi, and M. Bose
The Status of Earthquake Early Warning around the World: An Introductory Overview
Seismological Research Letters, September 1, 2009; 80(5): 682 - 693.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Seismological Society of America.