Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 2008; v. 98; no. 5; p. 2498-2506; DOI: 10.1785/0120080929
© 2008 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pasyanos, M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Short Notes

The Surface Wave Magnitude for the 9 October 2006 North Korean Nuclear Explosion

Jessie Bonner

Weston Geophysical Corporation, 4000 S. Medford, Suite 10W, Lufkin, Texas 75901 bonner{at}westongeophysical.com

Robert B. Herrmann

Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Saint Louis University, 3642 Lindell Boulevard, St. Louis, Missouri 63108 rbh{at}eas.slu.edu

David Harkrider

Weston Geophysical Corporation, 57 Bedford Street, Suite 102, Lexington, Massachusetts 02420 hark{at}ourconcord.net

Michael Pasyanos

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue, MS L-205, Livermore, California 94551-0808 pasyanos1{at}llnl.gov

Surface waves were generated by the North Korean nuclear explosion of 9 October 2006 and were recorded at epicentral distances up to 34°, from which we estimated a surface wave magnitude (Ms) of 2.94 with an interstation standard deviation of 0.17 magnitude units. The International Data Center estimated a body-wave magnitude (mb) of 4.1. This is the only explosion we have analyzed that was not easily screened as an explosion based on the differences between the Ms and mb estimates. Additionally, this Ms predicts a yield, based on empirical Ms/yield relationships, that is almost an order of magnitude larger than the 0.5–1 kt reported for this explosion. We investigate how emplacement medium effects on surface wave moment and magnitude may have contributed to the yield discrepancy.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Seismological Society of America.