|
|
||||||||
U.S. Geological Survey, MS977, Menlo Park, California 94025 spudich{at}usgs.gov jfletcher{at}usgs.gov
Online Material: Mainshock strain, rotation, and displacement gradient time series.
The 28 September 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake (Mw 6.0) and four aftershocks (Mw 4.7–5.1) were recorded on 12 accelerograph stations of the U.S. Geological Survey Parkfield seismic array (UPSAR), an array of three-component accelerographs occupying an area of about 1 km2 located 8.8 km from the San Andreas fault. Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity at UPSAR during the mainshock were 0.45g and 27 cm/sec, respectively. We determined both time-varying and peak values of ground dilatations, shear strains, torsions, tilts, torsion rates, and tilt rates by applying a time-dependent geodetic analysis to the observed array displacement time series. Array-derived dilatations agree fairly well with point measurements made on high sample rate recordings of the Parkfield-area dilatometers (Johnston et al., 2006). Torsion Fourier amplitude spectra agree well with ground velocity spectra, as expected for propagating plane waves. A simple predictive relation, using the predicted peak velocity from the Boore–Atkinson ground-motion prediction relation (Boore and Atkinson, 2007) scaled by a phase velocity of 1 km/sec, predicts observed peak Parkfield and Chi-Chi rotations (Huang, 2003) well. However, rotation rates measured during Mw 5 Ito, Japan, events observed on a gyro sensor (Takeo, 1998) are factors of 5–60 greater than those predicted by our predictive relation. This discrepancy might be caused by a scale dependence in rotation, with rotations measured over a short baseline exceeding those measured over long baselines. An alternative hypothesis is that events having significant non-double-couple mechanisms, like the Ito events, radiate much stronger rotations than double-couple events. If this is true, then rotational observations might provide an important source of new information for monitoring seismicity in volcanic areas.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. H. K. Lee, H. Igel, and M. D. Trifunac Recent Advances in Rotational Seismology Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2009; 80(3): 479 - 490. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H. K Lee, M. Celebi, M. I. Todorovska, and H. Igel Introduction to the Special Issue on Rotational Seismology and Engineering Applications Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2009; 99(2B): 945 - 957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H. K. Lee, B.-S. Huang, C. A. Langston, C.-J. Lin, C.-C. Liu, T.-C. Shin, T.-L. Teng, and C.-F. Wu Review: Progress in Rotational Ground-Motion Observations from Explosions and Local Earthquakes in Taiwan Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2009; 99(2B): 958 - 967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Graizer Review Article: Tutorial on Measuring Rotations Using Multipendulum Systems Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2009; 99(2B): 1064 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Godinho, P. Amado Mendes, A. Tadeu, A. Cadena-Isaza, C. Smerzini, F. J. Sanchez-Sesma, R. Madec, and D. Komatitsch Numerical Simulation of Ground Rotations along 2D Topographical Profiles under the Incidence of Elastic Plane Waves Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2009; 99(2B): 1147 - 1161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wang, H. Igel, F. Gallovic, and A. Cochard Source and Basin Effects on Rotational Ground Motions: Comparison with Translations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2009; 99(2B): 1162 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Nigbor, J. R. Evans, and C. R. Hutt Laboratory and Field Testing of Commercial Rotational Seismometers Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2009; 99(2B): 1215 - 1227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stupazzini, J. de la Puente, C. Smerzini, M. Kaser, H. Igel, and A. Castellani Study of Rotational Ground Motion in the Near-Field Region Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2009; 99(2B): 1271 - 1286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Graizer The Response to Complex Ground Motions of Seismometers with Galperin Sensor Configuration Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2009; 99(2B): 1366 - 1377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wassermann, S. Lehndorfer, H. Igel, and U. Schreiber Performance Test of a Commercial Rotational Motions Sensor Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2009; 99(2B): 1449 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Takeo Rotational Motions Observed during an Earthquake Swarm in April 1998 Offshore Ito, Japan Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2009; 99(2B): 1457 - 1467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Spudich and J. B. Fletcher Software for Inference of Dynamic Ground Strains and Rotations and Their Errors from Short Baseline Array Observations of Ground Motions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2009; 99(2B): 1480 - 1482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |