Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2008; v. 98; no. 3; p. 1399-1411; DOI: 10.1785/0120070101
© 2008 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moss, R. E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Quantifying Measurement Uncertainty of Thirty-Meter Shear-Wave Velocity

Robb Eric S. Moss

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 13-259, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California 93401-0353 rmoss{at}calpoly.edu

Thirty-meter shear-wave velocity (VS30) is commonly used to estimate near-surface conditions for site classification, seismic site response, liquefaction analysis, and other geotechnical earthquake engineering application. Quantifying the uncertainty in VS30 measurements is important for determining the accuracy and precision of this geophysical test. This study gathers existing available comparative and blind shear-wave velocity tests to evaluate the apparent or observable intra- and intermethod variability. Presented in this article are estimates of VS30 uncertainty for the invasive methods of downhole, suspension logging, and seismic cone penetration testing, the noninvasive method of spectral analysis of surface waves, and the method of shear-wave velocity correlated geologic units. Discussed is the issue of soil disturbance with respect to invasive methods and how this may result in measurement bias. Results of this study indicate that uncertainty of shear-wave velocity measurements are on the order of 1%–3% coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) for downhole, suspension logging, and seismic cone penetration testing, 5%–6% coefficient of variation for spectral analysis of surface waves, and 20%–35% coefficient of variation for shear-wave velocity correlated geologic units. Presented here are procedures for propagating the uncertainty and/or bias in forward analyses.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
F. Mulargia and S. Castellaro
Experimental Uncertainty on the Vs(z) Profile and Seismic Soil Classification
Seismological Research Letters, November 1, 2009; 80(6): 985 - 988.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. M. Thompson, L. G. Baise, R. E. Kayen, and B. B. Guzina
Impediments to Predicting Site Response: Seismic Property Estimation and Modeling Simplifications
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2009; 99(5): 2927 - 2949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Seismological Society of America.