Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2008; v. 98; no. 2; p. 918-930; DOI: 10.1785/0120060406
© 2008 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dengler, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Special Section: The 1906 Earthquake a Century Later

The 1906 Earthquake on California’s North Coast

Lori Dengler

Geology Department, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst Street, Arcata, California 95521 lad1{at}humboldt.edu

Humboldt County on California’s north coast was the furthest region from the 1906 epicenter to suffer significant damage in the 1906 earthquake. This study reassesses the impacts described in the state earthquake investigation commission report (Lawson, 1908) and subsequent intensity studies by examining reports from local newspapers, weather service logs, and the large collection of photographs, journals, and letters collected by local historical societies and museums. The highest intensity (modified Mercalli [MMI] IX) occurred in the Petrolia and upper Mattole Valley. The entire coastal region from Shelter Cove to the Eel River Valley experienced intensities of at least VIII. The most detailed damage descriptions come from Ferndale, where newspaper reports detail the damage to over 40 structures in the downtown area. Fewer than 2% of chimneys survived, both brick buildings were severely damaged, and about 25% of the commercial wood buildings were twisted by the ground shaking. Liquefaction was observed in the Mattole Valley throughout the Eel River Valley and as far north as Fields Landing on Humboldt Bay, which exceeded the aerial extent and scale of any other historic event, including the 1992 Cape Mendocino earthquake (Mw 7.2). In contrast to the isoseismal map published in the Lawson Report, damage in Eureka and the Humboldt Bay region was less than in Ferndale. Based on the severity of damage and scale of liquefaction, the 1906 earthquake was Humboldt County’s strongest historic event. Peak intensities likely exceeded the Cape Mendocino earthquake, the intensity VII or larger isoseismal was about twice as large, and peak ground velocity values likely exceeded 50 cm/sec in much of southern Humboldt County. The strong shaking in Humboldt County supports models showing significant slip along the northern segment of the 1906 rupture zone.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. T. Aagaard and G. C. Beroza
The 1906 San Francisco Earthquake a Century Later: Introduction to the Special Section
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 817 - 822.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Seismological Society of America.