HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Electronic Supplement Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Song, S. G. Articles by Segall, P. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

A Unified Source Model for the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake

Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, 397 Panama Mall, Stanford, California 94305-2215

^* Present address: URS Corporation, 566 El Dorado Street, Pasadena, California 91101; seok_goo_song@urscorp.com.

Online Material: A digital version of geodetic displacements and slip distribution.

We reconcile two previously discordant source models of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake and obtain a model that satisfies both triangulation and seismic data by allowing the rupture velocity to exceed the shear-wave velocity. Employing a projection method to remove the dependence on initial station positions allowed us to make use of a more stable triangulation network, including nonrepeated angle observations along the northern San Andreas fault. This strengthens the case for significant slip over the entire northern segment of the San Andreas fault from San Juan Bautista to Cape Mendocino during the 1906 earthquake. We also found that the teleseismic body-wave data can be reconciled with the geodetically derived slip model by allowing supershear rupture. This resolves a longstanding conflict between the two previous slip models (geodetic and seismic) of this earthquake. Supershear rupture has long been recognized as a theoretical possibility for strike-slip faulting, and it has been observed in several recent large strike-slip earthquakes, which raises the prospect that it might be typical for such events. Supershear rupture leads to substantially different strong ground motion, and as a result, may need to be taken into account when developing ground-motion prediction relations for large strike-slip earthquakes. Our final slip model has a seismic moment of 7.9x10²⁰ N m, which corresponds to a moment magnitude of M_w 7.9.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. I. Doser, K. B. Olsen, F. F. Pollitz, R. S. Stein, and S. Toda The 1911 M~6.6 Calaveras Earthquake: Source Parameters and the Role of Static, Viscoelastic, and Dynamic Coulomb Stress Changes Imparted by the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2009; 99(3): 1746 - 1759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. T. Aagaard and G. C. Beroza The 1906 San Francisco Earthquake a Century Later: Introduction to the Special Section Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 817 - 822. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Lorito, A. Piatanesi, and A. Lomax Rupture Process of the 18 April 1906 California Earthquake from Near-Field Tsunami Waveform Inversion Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 832 - 845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Lomax Location of the Focus and Tectonics of the Focal Region of the California Earthquake of 18 April 1906 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 846 - 860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Goldfinger, K. Grijalva, R. Burgmann, A. E. Morey, J. E. Johnson, C. H. Nelson, J. Gutierrez-Pastor, A. Ericsson, E. Karabanov, J. D. Chaytor, et al. Late Holocene Rupture of the Northern San Andreas Fault and Possible Stress Linkage to the Cascadia Subduction Zone Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 861 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Boatwright and H. Bundock The Distribution of Modified Mercalli Intensity in the 18 April 1906 San Francisco Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 890 - 900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Dengler The 1906 Earthquake on California's North Coast Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 918 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Hough and K. Hutton Revisiting the 1872 Owens Valley, California, Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 931 - 949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. T. Aagaard, T. M. Brocher, D. Dolenc, D. Dreger, R. W. Graves, S. Harmsen, S. Hartzell, S. Larsen, K. McCandless, S. Nilsson, et al. Ground-Motion Modeling of the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake, Part II: Ground-Motion Estimates for the 1906 Earthquake and Scenario Events Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 1012 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]