Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2008; v. 98; no. 2; p. 778-792; DOI: 10.1785/0120070119
© 2008 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by He, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lay, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Explosion-Source Energy Partitioning and Lg-Wave Excitation: Contributions of Free-Surface Scattering

Yaofeng He, Xiao-Bi Xie, and Thorne Lay

Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, California 95064 xie{at}pmc.ucsc.edu

A 2D boundary-element numerical simulation approach and a local slowness analysis method for an embedded array are used to quantify effects of topographic scattering on near-source energy partitioning for simple underground explosion sources. Various parameters, including free-surface models with different root mean square (rms) random topographic fluctuations and correlation lengths, source depths from 0.25 to 3 km, and Q values from 50 to infinity are included in the numerical simulations, with energy responses of different phases being determined as functions of frequency. The results reveal that for a crustal model with a relatively high surface velocity, near-source free-surface scattering provides an important coupling mechanism that can impart additional explosion energy to the Lg wave. At relatively low frequencies, and for a moderately rugged free-surface, the Rg-to-Lg transfer is quite efficient, while at higher frequencies or for a very rugged free surface, the body wave to Lg transfer may dominate the process. The Rg excitation functions, source depth, and topographic correlation length all contribute frequency dependence to the Lg excitation function. The presence of a low Q value within the uppermost crust severely attenuates the high-frequency energy transferred to the Lg wave.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. L. Stevens, H. Xu, and G. E. Baker
Reply to "Comment on 'An Upper Bound on Rg to Lg Scattering Using Modal Energy Conservation' by Jeffry L. Stevens, Heming Xu, and G. Eli Baker" by Howard Patton and Indra N. Gupta
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2010; 100(1): 416 - 421.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Seismological Society of America.