HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Arrowsmith, S. J. Articles by Arrowsmith, M. D. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Infrasonic Signals from Large Mining Explosions

Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, California 92093-0225 sarrowsmith{at}gmail.com hedlin{at}epicenter.ucsd.edu

Brian Stump and Marie D. Arrowsmith

Department of Geological Sciences, Dedman College, Southern Methodist University, P.O. Box 750395, Dallas, Texas 75275-0395 bstump{at}smu.edu plutonium{at}gmail.com

^* Present address: Los Alamos National Laboratory, EES-2, P.O. Box 1663, MS D401, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545.

We study infrasonic signals from large surface mining explosions in Wyoming. Detections at the Pinedale Infrasound Array (PDIAR) (obtained using a conventional array-processing technique) are automatically associated with ground-truth mining explosions at a range of 368 km. We then focus on four clear signals from mining explosions. By performing a detailed noise study and modeling the propagation of infrasound using a raytracing algorithm and ground-to-space (G2S) atmospheric models, we assess the factors that contribute to the detectability of mining explosions. We find that we can explain most of the observations by propagation and noise effects alone, but that there are at least two notable outliers. Because of high noise levels at the PDIAR array, which places significant constraints on the sizes of mining explosions that can be detected, these results are strongly biased and must be reassessed for lower-noise infrasound arrays.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. J. Arrowsmith, R. Whitaker, C. Katz, and C. Hayward The F-Detector Revisited: An Improved Strategy for Signal Detection at Seismic and Infrasound Arrays Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2009; 99(1): 449 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]