HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Pasolini, C. Articles by Lolli, B. GeoRef GeoRef Citation

The Attenuation of Seismic Intensity in Italy, Part II: Modeling and Validation

Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 8, I-40127 Bologna, Italy chiara.pasolini{at}gmail.com

D. Albarello

Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Siena, Via Laterina 8, I-53100 Siena, Italy albarello{at}unisi.it

P. Gasperini

Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 8, I-40127 Bologna, Italy paolo.gasperini{at}unibo.it

V. D’Amico^*

Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Siena, Via Laterina 8, I-53100 Siena, Italy

B. Lolli

Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 8, I-40127 Bologna, Italy barbara.lolli{at}unibo.it

^* Present address: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via della Faggiola, 32, I-56126 Pisa, Italy; damico@pi.ingv.it.

Several different attenuation models have recently been proposed for the Italian region to characterize the decay of macroseismic intensity with the distance from the source. The significant scatter between these relationships and some significant drawbacks that seem to characterize previous approaches (described in a companion article by Pasolini et al., 2008) suggest that the problem needs to be reconsidered. As a first step toward more detailed analyses in the future, this study aimed at developing an isotropic attenuation relationship for the Italian area. Because this attenuation relationship has to be used primarily in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment, major attention was given to evaluating the attenuation relationship in its complete probabilistic form. Another important aspect of this study was the preliminary evaluation of the intrinsic (i.e., independent of the specific attenuation relationship to be used) scattering of data, which represents the lowest threshold for the residual variance that cannot be explained by the attenuation relationship. Furthermore, the peculiar formal features of intensity data and relevant uncertainties were considered carefully. To reduce possible biases, the completeness of the available database was checked and a suitable data selection procedure was applied. Since epicentral intensity cannot be defined unambiguously from the experimental point of view, the attenuation relationship was scaled with a new variable that is more representative of the earthquake dimension. Several criteria were considered when evaluating competing attenuation formulas (explained variance, Bayesian information criteria, Akaike information criteria, etc.). Statistical uncertainty about empirical parameters was evaluated by using standard approaches and bootstrap simulations. The performance of the selected relationship with respect to a control sample was analyzed by using a distribution-free approach. The resulting equation for the expected intensity I at a site located at epicentral distance R is

where , h=(3.91±0.27) km, and I_E is the average expected intensity at the epicenter for a given earthquake that can be computed from the intensity data (when available) or by using empirical relationships with the moment magnitude M_w or the epicentral intensity I₀ reported by the Italian seismic catalog

Comparison of the model standard deviation (S.D.) (0.69 intensity degrees) with the intrinsic one (0.62) indicates that this attenuation equation is not far from being optimal.