Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 2008; v. 98; no. 1; p. 448-453; DOI: 10.1785/0120070133
© 2008 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rhoades, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by McVerry, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Short Notes

A Simple Test for Inhibition of Very Strong Shaking in Ground-Motion Models

David A. Rhoades, John X. Zhao and Graeme H. McVerry

GNS Science, P.O. Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand 5010

There is considerable interest in the credibility of probabilities of exceedance estimated by ground-motion models for very high accelerations. A common statistical approach to this problem has been to examine the upper-tail shape of the distribution of residuals between recorded data and the model for evidence of suppression of high residuals. In this study, a more direct method is suggested, in which the actual number of times given accelerations are exceeded is compared to the expected numbers in strong-motion data sets. The method is illustrated by application to New Zealand and Japan models for peak ground acceleration (PGA). For the Japan model, which is based on a particularly large data set, the ratio of actual to expected number declines in a statistically significant and regular fashion from about 1 at 0.3g to about 0.15 at 1.0g. If these results are indicative of ground-motion models in general, the implications for probabilistic seismic hazard analyses may be far reaching. The method and results have particular importance for the analysis of seismic hazard at sites of critical facilities where strong ground motions with very long return periods may be of interest.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Seismological Society of America.