Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 2007; v. 97; no. 6; p. 2182-2189; DOI: 10.1785/0120070037
© 2007 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Electronic Supplement
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kato, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Short Notes

How Frictional Properties Lead to Either Rupture-Front Focusing or Cracklike Behavior

Naoyuki Kato

Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan nkato{at}eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Online Material: Figures illustrating the effects of velocity-weakening and velocity-strengthening friction on rupture evolution.

A numerical simulation of the stress concentration and earthquake rupture process of a circular asperity is performed using a laboratory-derived rate- and state-dependent friction law. The asperity is locked during an interseismic period, and it is surrounded by regions of stable sliding. This situation is thought to be common at plate interfaces with relatively low seismic coupling. Aseismic sliding penetrates into the asperity, and the distance of its penetration depends on frictional properties. Shear stress is concentrated in the boundary regions between the locked and stable sliding regions before earthquake occurrence, and this stress distribution affects the earthquake rupture process. When aseismic sliding propagates little into the asperity, rupture propagates faster in the stress concentrated region, and rupture fronts propagating clockwise and counterclockwise around the asperity meet at an end of the asperity opposite to the rupture initiation point. This rupture-front focusing produces high slip rates in the final stage of asperity rupture, which is consistent with observations of short-period seismic waves radiated from some large interplate earthquakes. On the other hand, when the distance that aseismic sliding propagates into the asperity is long, rupture starts near the center of the asperity and propagates outward like an expanding crack, generating no rupture-front focusing.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Seismological Society of America.