Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 2007; v. 97; no. 6; p. 1970-1989; DOI: 10.1785/0120070042
© 2007 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Connell, D. R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Archuleta, R. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Influence of Dip and Velocity Heterogeneity on Reverse- and Normal-Faulting Rupture Dynamics and Near-Fault Ground Motions

Daniel R. H. O’Connell*

Bureau of Reclamation, P.O. Box 25007 86-68330, Denver, Colorado 80225

Shuo Ma{dagger}

Department of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106 sma{at}crustal.ucsb.edu

Ralph J. Archuleta

Department of Earth Science and Institute for Crustal Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106 ralph{at}crustal.ucsb.edu

* Present address: William Lettis and Associates, Inc. Golden, Colorado 80401; oconnell{at}lettis.com.

{dagger} Present address: Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Panama Mall 397, Stanford, California 94305.

We investigate the influence of fault dip (35°–60°) and crustal velocity heterogeneity on rupture dynamics and near-fault ground motions from normal- and reverse-faulting. The same initial conditions were used, except for the direction of initial shear stress, in each dynamic rupture calculation. We used two 3D elastic finite-element approaches that employ split nodes for the computations. In homogeneous and weakly heterogeneous half-spaces with faults dipping lsim50°, maximum fault-normal peak velocities occurred on the hanging wall. However, for fault dips {gtrsim}50°, maximum fault-normal peak velocities occurred on the footwall. Bilateral and unilateral rupture simulations in weakly heterogeneous media found that reverse-faulting slip velocities (frequency band 1–3.5 Hz) were on average 39% larger than those during normal faulting. However, on average reverse-faulting slip velocities were only 16% larger than normal-faulting slip velocities for frequencies <1 Hz. This suggests that normal-faulting ground motions may have peak spectral accelerations at distinctly lower frequencies than reverse-faulting ground motions. Normal faults often juxtapose a low-velocity hanging-wall sedimentary basin against relatively stiff footwall rocks. A 3D velocity model was constructed with a thick (several kilometers) low-velocity basin with a strong shear-wave velocity contrast (factor of 3) across a fault dipping 55°. While the strong lateral velocity contrast reduced normal-faulting fault-normal peak velocities on the footwall, substantial (0.5–1 m/sec) fault-normal peak velocities remained on the footwall. Meanwhile even larger fault-normal peak velocities occurred on the more compliant hanging wall. These results indicate that simple amplitude parameterizations based on the hanging wall and/or footwall and the fault normal and/or fault parallel currently used in ground motion prediction relations may not be appropriate for some faults with dips >50°.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Seismological Society of America.