Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 2007; v. 97; no. 5; p. 1730-1741; DOI: 10.1785/0120060052
© 2007 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Hutchenson, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A Mathematical Statistics Formulation of the Teleseismic Explosion Identification Problem with Multiple Discriminants

D. N. Anderson1, D. K. Fagan1, M. A. Tinker2, G. D. Kraft2 and K. D. Hutchenson2

1 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Richland, Washington 99352
 (D.N.A., D.K.F.)
2 Quantum Technology Sciences, Inc.
Cocoa Beach, Florida 32931
 (M.A.T., G.D.K., K.D.H.)

Seismic monitoring for underground nuclear explosions answers three questions for all global seismic activity: Where is the seismic event located? What is the event source type (event identification)? If the event is an explosion, what is the yield? The answers to these questions involves processing seismometer waveforms with propagation paths predominately in the mantle. Four discriminants commonly used to identify teleseismic events are depth from travel time, presence of long-period surface energy (mb vs. MS), depth from reflective phases, and polarity of first motion. The seismic theory for these discriminants is well established in the literature (see, for example, Blandford [1982] and Pomeroy et al. [1982]). However, the physical basis of each has not been formally integrated into probability models to account for statistical error and provide discriminant calculations appropriate, in general, for multidimensional event identification. This article develops a mathematical statistics formulation of these discriminants and offers a novel approach to multidimensional discrimination that is readily extensible to other discriminants. For each discriminant a probability model is formulated under a general null hypothesis of H0: Explosion Characteristics. The veracity of the hypothesized model is measured with a p-value calculation (see Freedman et al. [1991] and Stuart et al. [1994]) that can be filtered to be approximately normally distributed and is in the range [0, 1]. A value near zero rejects H0 and a moderate to large value indicates consistency with H0. The hypothesis test formulation ensures that seismic phenomenology is tied to the interpretation of the p-value. These p-values are then embedded into a multidiscriminant algorithm that is developed from regularized discrimination methods proposed by DiPillo (1976), Smidt and McDonald (1976), and Friedman (1989). Performance of the methods is demonstrated with 102 teleseismic events with magnitudes (mb) ranging from 5 to 6.5. Example p-value calculations are given for two of these events.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Seismological Society of America.