Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 2007; v. 97; no. 5; p. 1632-1645; DOI: 10.1785/0120070069
© 2007 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savage, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, S.-B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Postearthquake Relaxation and Aftershock Accumulation Linearly Related after the 2003 M 6.5 Chengkung, Taiwan, and the 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield, California, Earthquakes

J. C. Savage1 and S.-B. Yu2

1 U.S. Geological Survey, MS977
345 Middlefield Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
 (J.C.S.)
2 Institute of Earth Sciences, Acadamia Sinica
P.O. Box 1-55, Nanking
Taipei, Taiwan 115
 (S.-B.Y.)

We treat both the number of earthquakes and the deformation following a mainshock as the superposition of a steady background accumulation and the postearthquake process. The preseismic displacement and seismicity rates ru and rE are used as estimates of the background rates. Let t be the time after the mainshock, u(t) + u0 the postseismic displacement less the background accumulation rut, and {Delta}N(t) the observed cumulative number of postseismic earthquakes less the background accumulation rEt. For the first 160 days (duration limited by the occurrence of another nearby earthquake) following the Chengkung (M 6.5, 10 December 2003, eastern Taiwan) and the first 560 days following the Parkfield (M 6.0, 28 September 2004, central California) earthquakes u(t) + u0 is a linear function of {Delta}N(t). The aftershock accumulation {Delta}N(t) for both earthquakes is described by the modified Omori Law d{Delta}N/dt {propto} (1 + t/{tau})p with p = 0.96 and {tau} = 0.03 days. Although the Chengkung earthquake involved sinistral, reverse slip on a moderately dipping fault and the Parkfield earthquake right-lateral slip on a near-vertical fault, the earthquakes share an unusual feature: both occurred on faults exhibiting interseismic fault creep at the surface. The source of the observed postseismic deformation appears to be afterslip on the coseismic rupture. The linear relation between u(t) + u0 and N(t) suggests that this afterslip also generates the aftershocks. The linear relation between u(t) + u0 and {Delta}N(t) obtains after neither the 1999 M 7.1 Hector Mine (southern California) nor the 1999 M 7.6 Chi-Chi (central Taiwan) earthquakes, neither of which occurred on fault segments exhibiting fault creep.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Seismological Society of America.