| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Atmospheric, Earth, and Energy
Department
Energy and Environment Directorate
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
P.O. Box 808, L-205
Livermore, California 94551
(M.P.F., S.C.M.)
2 Department of Earth and Atmospheric
Sciences
Saint Louis University
3507 Laclede Avenue
St. Louis, Missouri 63103
(K.D.K.)
We demonstrate our ability to improve regional travel-time prediction and
seismic event location accuracy using an a priori 3D velocity model of
Western Eurasia and North Africa (WENA1.0). Travel-time residuals are assessed
relative to the iasp91 model for approximately 6000 Pg, Pn,
and P arrivals, from seismic events having 2
epicenter
accuracy between 1 km and 25 km (ground truth 1 [GT1] and GT25,
respectively), recorded at 39 stations throughout the model region. Ray paths
range in length between 0° and 40° (local, regional, and near
teleseismic) providing depth sounding that spans the crust and upper mantle. The
dataset also provides representative geographic sampling across Eurasia and
North Africa including aseismic areas. The WENA1.0 model markedly improves
travel-time predictions for most stations with an average variance reduction of
29% for all ray paths from the GT25 events; when we consider GT5 and better
events alone, the variance reduction is 49%. For location tests we use 196
geographically distributed GT5 and better events. In 134 cases (68% of the
events), locations are improved, and average mislocation is reduced from 24.9 km
to 17.7 km. We develop a travel-time uncertainty model that is used to calculate
location coverage ellipses. The coverage ellipses for WENA1.0 are validated to
be representative of epicenter error and are smaller than those for
iasp91 by 37%. We conclude that a priori models are directly
applicable where data coverage limits tomographic and empirical approaches, and
the development of the uncertainty model enables merging of a priori
and data-driven approaches using Bayesian techniques.
Online material: Correction surfaces and histograms of travel-time residuals for 40 stations.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. Lin, C. H. Thurber, H. Zhang, E. Hauksson, P. M. Shearer, F. Waldhauser, T. M. Brocher, and J. Hardebeck A California Statewide Three-Dimensional Seismic Velocity Model from Both Absolute and Differential Times Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2010; 100(1): 225 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Ballard, J. R. Hipp, and C. J. Young Efficient and Accurate Calculation of Ray Theory Seismic Travel Time through Variable Resolution 3D Earth Models Seismological Research Letters, November 1, 2009; 80(6): 989 - 999. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Bondar and K. L. McLaughlin A New Ground Truth Data Set For Seismic Studies Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2009; 80(3): 465 - 472. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Bondar and K. McLaughlin Seismic Location Bias and Uncertainty in the Presence of Correlated and Non-Gaussian Travel-Time Errors Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2009; 99(1): 172 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Zucca, W. R. Walter, A. J. Rodgers, P. Richards, M. E. Pasyanos, S. C. Myers, T. Lay, D. Harris, and T. Antoun The Prospect of Using Three-Dimensional Earth Models to Improve Nuclear Explosion Monitoring and Ground-motion Hazard Assessment Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 31 - 39. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
