Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2007; v. 97; no. 2; p. 614-623; DOI: 10.1785/0120060111
© 2007 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ge, J.
Right arrow Articles by Stovall, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Determination of Shallow Shear-Wave Velocity at Mississippi Embayment Sites Using Vertical Seismic Profiling Data

Jiandang Ge1, Jose Pujol2, Shahram Pezeshk3 and Scott Stovall3

1 Center for Earthquake Research and Information
University of Memphis
Memphis, Tennessee 38152
 (J.G.)

2 Department of Earth Sciences
University of Memphis
Memphis, Tennessee 38152
 (J.P.)

3 Department of Civil Engineering
University of Memphis
Memphis, Tennessee 38152
 (S.P., S.S.)

We used vertical seismic profiling (VSP) data collected in shallow boreholes (about 40–60 m deep) to determine the shear-wave velocity at four sites in the Mississippi embayment in southwestern Tennessee. The source was an air-powered hammer that produces repeatable SH waves, which were recorded by source monitor geophones deployed on the surface very close to the source. Three approaches were used to determine interval velocities: an approximate zero-offset method, a layer- stripping method, and a waveform-matching method. The first two methods use arrival-time picks, whereas the latter is based on the fit of synthetic VSP data to the first half-cycle (approximately) of each trace. The advantage of this method over the other two is that it uses a segment of the data, rather than a single data point. Therefore, the velocities determined using the waveform-matching method are better constrained and are not affected by picking errors, which may translate into significant spurious velocity variations. The source wavelets recorded by one of the monitor geophones and the velocity model computed with the layer-stripping method were used to generate synthetic vertical seismic profiling data for comparison with the actual data. Then the model velocities were modified interactively, one layer at a time, until a satisfactory match was achieved. This required including attenuation in the computation of the synthetic data. The four sites investigated in this study can be divided into two groups: low-velocity sites (Shelby Farms and Covington) and high-velocity sites (Brownsville and Jackson). These last two sites are at larger distances from the embayment axis than the other two, which means that the difference in velocities probably corresponds to the presence of different geologic units. Good agreements between the lithology in the boreholes and the velocity profiles were obtained for all the four sites.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. Ge, J. Pujol, S. Pezeshk, and S. Stovall
Determination of Shallow Shear-Wave Attenuation in the Mississippi Embayment Using Vertical Seismic Profiling Data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2009; 99(3): 1636 - 1649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Seismological Society of America.