HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Atkinson, G. M. Articles by Kaka, S. I. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Relationships between Felt Intensity and Instrumental Ground Motion in the Central United States and California

¹ Department of Earth Sciences
University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada
 (G.M.A.)

² Department of Earth Sciences
Carleton University
Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada
 (S.I.K.)

In this study, we develop empirical relationships between instrumental ground-motion parameters and observed Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) by using data from felt moderate earthquakes in the central United States (CUS) that were also recorded on broadband seismographic networks and strong-motion recorders in the CUS region. The data are calibrated and supplemented at higher intensities based on observations in California. MMI for ShakeMap applications in the CUS region, and in California, can be predicted from recorded peak ground velocity (PGV), in cm/sec, with a standard deviation of 0.8 MMI units, using the following equation:

MMI = 4.37 + 1.32(log PGV) log PGV 0.48

MMI = 3.54 + 3.03(log PGV) log PGV 0.48

There are weak-magnitude and distance-dependent trends in the residuals for this relationship. These trends, if not removed, may lead to apparent regional dependencies in MMI versus ground-motion amplitude relationships. Refined relationships that include magnitude and distance as predictive variables that are applicable throughout North America are defined.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Delavaud, F. Scherbaum, N. Kuehn, and C. Riggelsen Information-Theoretic Selection of Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Seismic Hazard Analysis: An Applicability Study Using Californian Data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2009; 99(6): 3248 - 3263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Moratto, G. Costa, and P. Suhadolc Real-Time Generation of ShakeMaps in the Southeastern Alps Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2009; 99(4): 2489 - 2501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Woolery, R. Street, and P. Hart Evaluation of Linear Site-Response Methods for Estimating Higher-Frequency (> 2 Hz) Ground Motions in the Lower Wabash River Valley of the Central United States Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2009; 80(3): 525 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G-A. Tselentis and L. Danciu Empirical Relationships between Modified Mercalli Intensity and Engineering Ground-Motion Parameters in Greece Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 1863 - 1875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Atkinson Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America from a Referenced Empirical Approach: Implications for Epistemic Uncertainty Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1304 - 1318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. T. Maqsood and J. Schwarz Analysis of Building Damage during the 8 October 2005 Earthquake in Pakistan Seismological Research Letters, March 1, 2008; 79(2): 163 - 177. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Atkinson, S. I. Kaka, D. Eaton, A. Bent, V. Peci, and S. Halchuk A Very Close Look at a Moderate Earthquake near Sudbury, Ontario Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2008; 79(1): 119 - 131. [Full Text] [PDF]