HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Silver, P. G. Articles by Majer, E. L. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Active Source Monitoring of Cross-Well Seismic Travel Time for Stress-Induced Changes

¹ Department of Terrestrial Magnetism
Carnegie Institution of Washington
5241 Broad Branch Road, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20015
 (P.G.S.)
² Earth Science Division
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Berkeley, California 94720
 (T.M.D., E.L.M.)
³ Department of Earth Science
Rice University
6100 Main Street
Houston, Texas 77005
niu{at}rice.edu
 (F.N.)

We have conducted a series of cross-well experiments to continuously measure in situ temporal variations in seismic velocity at two test sites: building 64 (B64) and Richmond Field Station (RFS) of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California. A piezoelectric source was used to generate highly repeatable signals, and a string of 24 hydrophones was used to record the signals. The B64 experiment was conducted utilizing two boreholes 17 m deep and 3 m apart for 160 h. At RFS, we collected a 36-day continuous record in a cross-borehole facility using two 70-m-deep holes separated by 30 m. With signal enhancement techniques we were able to achieve a precision of 6.0 nsec and 10 nsec in delay-time estimation from stacking of 1-hr records during the 7- and 35-day observation periods at the B64 and RFS sites, which correspond to 3 and 0.5 ppm of their travel times, respectively. Delay time measured at B64 has a variation of 2 µsec in the 160-hr period and shows a strong and positive correlation with the barometric pressure change at the site. At RFS, after removal of a linear trend, we find a delay-time variation of 2.5 µsec, which exhibits a significant negative correlation with barometric pressure. We attribute the observed correlations to stress sensitivity of seismic velocity known from laboratory studies. The positive and negative sign observed in the correlation is likely related to the expected near- and far-field effects of this stress dependence in a poroelastic medium. The stress sensitivity is estimated to be 10^–6/ Pa and 10^–7/Pa at the B64 and RFS site, respectively.