|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Geology and
Geophysics
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin
53706
(A.B.L.)
2 Department of Earth and Planetary
Sciences
University of California
Berkeley, California
94720
rallen{at}berkeley.edu
(R.M.A.)
Scaling relations between the predominant period of P-wave arrivals
and earthquake magnitude are explored using datasets from the Pacific Northwest
and
Japan, and compared with previous observations in southern California
(Allen and
Kanamori, 2003). We find the same scaling for events in all three
geologically diverse
regions. The sensitivity of the predominant period observation to magnitude can
be
optimized using various frequency bands for different magnitude ranges and in
different
regions. The ability to estimate the magnitude using the first few seconds of
the P wave offers a methodology for earthquake early warning. The
accuracy of
magnitude estimates increases with the number of stations reporting predominant
period observations. The most significant improvements in the magnitude estimate
occur when the number of reporting stations increased from one to four. As in
southern
California, we find that the average absolute magnitude error is
0.5
magnitude
units when the closest four stations to the epicenter are used.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. M. Allen, P. Gasparini, O. Kamigaichi, and M. Bose The Status of Earthquake Early Warning around the World: An Introductory Overview Seismological Research Letters, September 1, 2009; 80(5): 682 - 693. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Olivieri, R. M. Allen, and G. Wurman The Potential for Earthquake Early Warning in Italy Using ElarmS Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2008; 98(1): 495 - 503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |