Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 2007; v. 97; no. 1B; p. 140-150; DOI: 10.1785/0120040091
© 2007 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lockman, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Magnitude-Period Scaling Relations for Japan and the Pacific Northwest: Implications for Earthquake Early Warning

Andrew B. Lockman1 and Richard M. Allen2

1 Department of Geology and Geophysics
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin 53706
 (A.B.L.)
2 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences
University of California
Berkeley, California 94720
rallen{at}berkeley.edu
 (R.M.A.)

Scaling relations between the predominant period of P-wave arrivals and earthquake magnitude are explored using datasets from the Pacific Northwest and Japan, and compared with previous observations in southern California (Allen and Kanamori, 2003). We find the same scaling for events in all three geologically diverse regions. The sensitivity of the predominant period observation to magnitude can be optimized using various frequency bands for different magnitude ranges and in different regions. The ability to estimate the magnitude using the first few seconds of the P wave offers a methodology for earthquake early warning. The accuracy of magnitude estimates increases with the number of stations reporting predominant period observations. The most significant improvements in the magnitude estimate occur when the number of reporting stations increased from one to four. As in southern California, we find that the average absolute magnitude error is ~0.5 magnitude units when the closest four stations to the epicenter are used.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. Olivieri, R. M. Allen, and G. Wurman
The Potential for Earthquake Early Warning in Italy Using ElarmS
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2008; 98(1): 495 - 503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Seismological Society of America.