Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; January 2007; v. 97; no. 1A; p. S115-S127; DOI: 10.1785/0120050620
© 2007 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Electronic Supplement
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rhie, J.
Right arrow Articles by Romanowicz, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Slip of the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman Earthquake from Joint Inversion of Long-Period Global Seismic Waveforms and GPS Static Offsets

Junkee Rhie1, Douglas Dreger1, Roland Bürgmann1 and Barbara Romanowicz1

1 Berkeley Seismological Laboratory
University of California
Berkeley, California 94720-4760

The 26 December 2004 Great Sumatra–Andaman earthquake opened a new era for seismologists to understand the complex source process of a great earthquake. This is the first event with moment magnitude greater than 9 since the deployment of high-dynamic-range broadband seismic and Global Positioning System (GPS) sensors around the globe. This study presents an analysis of the ruptured fault- plane geometry and slip distribution using long-period teleseismic data and GPS- measured static surface displacements near the fault plane. We employ a rupture geometry with six along-strike segments with and without a steeper down-dip extension. The fault segments are further subdivided into a total of 201 ~30 x 30 km fault patches. Sensitivity tests of fault-plane geometry and the variation in rupture velocity indicate that the dip and curvature of the fault plane are not well resolved from the given data set and the rupture velocity is constrained to be between 1.8 and 2.6 km/sec. Error estimations of the slip distribution using a random selection of seismic and GPS station subsets (50% of all stations) illustrate that slip is well resolved along the whole rupture and the mean slip uncertainty is less than 1.5 m (about 11%). Although it is possible that near-field GPS data include contributions from additional postseismic transient deformation, our preferred model suggests that the Sumatra–Andaman earthquake had a magnitude of Mw 9.20 + 0.05/–0.06.

Online material: Comparison of slip models, GPS modeling, waveform fit, fault geometry, and inversion parameters.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. L. Bilek, K. Satake, and K. Sieh
Introduction to the Special Issue on the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake and the Indian Ocean Tsunami
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, January 1, 2007; 97(1A): S1 - S5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. L. Bilek
Using Earthquake Source Durations along the Sumatra-Andaman Subduction System to Examine Fault-Zone Variations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, January 1, 2007; 97(1A): S62 - S70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Seismological Society of America.