HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Baisch, S. Articles by de Graaf, L. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Induced Seismicity during the Stimulation of a Geothermal HFR Reservoir in the Cooper Basin, Australia

¹ Q-con GmbH
Marktstr. 39
76887 Bad Bergzabern, Germany
baisch{at}q-con.de
 (S.B., R.W., R.V.)
² Geodynamics Limited
11 Lang Parade, Milton
Queensland 4064, Australia
 (D.W., L. de G.)

A long-term fluid-injection experiment was performed in the Cooper Basin (Australia) in 2003 to stimulate a geothermal reservoir. More than 20,000 m³ of water were injected into the granitic crust at 4250 m depth. During reservoir stimulation about 27,000 induced seismic events were detected by a local, eight- station seismic monitoring system deployed in nearby boreholes. Hypocenter locations for 11,068 events were determined by using an averaged velocity model that was calibrated by associating early events with the injection point. The spatial hypocenter distribution forms a nearly subhorizontal structure with a lateral extension of 2 km x 1.5 km and an apparent thickness of approximately 150–200 m, which is in the order of the hypocenter location confidence limits. The hypocenter distribution exhibits a high degree of spatiotemporal ordering with the seismic activity systematically migrating away from the injection well with increasing time. Previously activated regions become seismically quiet indicating relaxation processes. High-resolution relative hypocenter locations determined for clusters of "similar" events locally reduce the apparent thickness of the structure to the level of a few tens of meters indicating that the reservoir is dominated by a single fracture zone only. Consistent with these findings, a subsequently drilled well intersects a dominating, high-permeable fracture within 15 m of the predicted intersection depth. Based on drilling and logging information, the fracture zone is interpreted as a preexisting (possibly tectonically formed) feature that (partly) sheared during stimulation. Triggering of the induced seismicity is found to be predominantly controlled by the increase of fluid pressure implicating a (local) reduction of the effective normal stress resolved on the fracture plane. Additionally, perturbations of the stress field caused by the largest-magnitude events may trigger seismicity ("aftershocks") on a local, short-ranging scale.