Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 2006; v. 96; no. 5; p. 1961-1965; DOI: 10.1785/0120060017
© 2006 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Short Notes

On the Properties of Predominant-Period Estimators for Earthquake Early Warning

Cecily J. Wolfe1

1 Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
cecily{at}soest.hawaii.edu

Recent results suggest that measurements of the average "predominant period," {tau}p, of an earthquake using the first few seconds of P waves provide a rapid approximate estimate of magnitude that can be used for earthquake early warning systems. Although these prior studies demonstrate the empirical value of such an approach, we here examine the theoretical properties of the predominant period estimator. We show that this estimator is a nonlinear function of spectral amplitude and period that gives greater weight to higher amplitudes and higher frequencies in the spectrum. Our results also demonstrate that there are inherent errors in individual measurements using a time-dependent maximum value of the {tau}p estimator derived from a recursion relation. Whereas some of the observed variability in predominant period estimates of magnitude likely is due to local site effects, our analyses suggest that the nonideal properties of the estimator may also add noise to the results. Given the potential importance for earthquake early warning systems, we suggest that more detailed analyses into the magnitude dependence of the spectral characteristics of initial P-wave data, such as using multitaper spectral or wavelet approaches, could be helpful in designing improved methods to further optimize performance.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Seismological Research LettersHome page
R. M. Allen, P. Gasparini, O. Kamigaichi, and M. Bose
The Status of Earthquake Early Warning around the World: An Introductory Overview
Seismological Research Letters, September 1, 2009; 80(5): 682 - 693.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. Yamada and S. Ide
Limitation of the Predominant-Period Estimator for Earthquake Early Warning and the Initial Rupture of Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2008; 98(6): 2739 - 2745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. Olivieri and J. Schweitzer
An Empirical Procedure for Rapid Magnitude Estimation in Italy
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1750 - 1755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. B. Lockman and R. M. Allen
Magnitude-Period Scaling Relations for Japan and the Pacific Northwest: Implications for Earthquake Early Warning
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2007; 97(1B): 140 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Seismological Society of America.