HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Clinton, J. F. Articles by Solanki, K. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

An Evaluation of the SCSN Moment Tensor Solutions: Robustness of the M_w Magnitude Scale, Style of Faulting, and Automation of the Method

^1
2 Seismological Laboratory
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences
California Institute of Technology
Pasadena, California 91125
hauksson{at}gps.caltech.edu
solanki{at}gps.caltech.edu

^* Present address: Swiss Seismological Service (SED), Department of Geophysics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zürich.

We have generated moment tensor solutions and moment magnitudes (M_w) for >1700 earthquakes of local magnitude (M_L) >3.0 that occurred from September 1999 to November 2005 in southern California. The method is running as an automated real-time component of the Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN), with solutions available within 12 min of event nucleation. For local events, the method can reliably obtain good-quality solutions for M_w with M_L >3.5, and for the moment tensor for events with M_L >4.0. The method uses the 1D Time-Domain INVerse Code (TDMT_INVC) software package (Dreger, 2003). The Green’s functions have been predetermined for various velocity profiles in southern California, which are used in the inversion of observed three-component broadband waveforms (10–100 sec), using data from at least four stations. Moment tensor solutions have an assigned quality factor dependent on the number of stations in the inversion, and the goodness of fit between synthetic and observed data. If a minimum quality factor is attained, the M_L or M_w is 5.0 or greater, and if the event is in the southern California reporting regions, the M_w will be the official SCSN/CISN magnitude.

The M_w from the high-quality solutions determined from our method generally correlate very well with reviewed M_L, except in regions at the perimeter of the network. The M_w reported here indicates the SCSN M_L systematically underestimates the magnitude in the Mexicali region of Baja California, Mono Lakes area, Coso region, and the Brawley seismic zone, and overestimates the magnitude in the Coastal Ranges.

Comparisons of the moment tensors determined using this model are made with Harvard Centroid Moment Tensors generated for larger earthquakes in the California region, and recent 3D models for events in the Los Angeles region, with excellent correlation.

Most of the earthquakes with good-quality solutions exhibit strike-slip faulting, in particular, along the major late Quaternary strike-slip faults. Thrust faulting on east– west-striking planes is observed along the southern edge of the Transverse Ranges, while northwest-striking thrust faulting is observed in the Coastal Ranges. Normal faulting is most common in Baja California and southern Sierra Nevada including the western Basin and Range region.

Poor-quality solutions with unreliable M_w are caused by excessive background noise in the waveforms. Small events (M_L < 4.0) can be affected by ambient noise or teleseisms, but larger events can also have unreliable solutions if they follow a recent large regional event.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Tan and D. Helmberger A New Method for Determining Small Earthquake Source Parameters Using Short-Period P Waves Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2007; 97(4): 1176 - 1195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]