HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Johnson, K. M. Articles by Larson, K. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Frictional Properties on the San Andreas Fault near Parkfield, California, Inferred from Models of Afterslip following the 2004 Earthquake

¹ Department of Earth and Planetary Science
University of California
Berkeley, California 94720-4767
 (K.M.J., R.B.)
² Department of Geological Sciences
Indiana University
2002 E. 10th Street
Bloomington, Indiana 47405
 (K.M.J.)
³ Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences
University of Colorado
Boulder, Colorado 80309-0429
 (K.L.)

The abundance of geodetic and seismic data recording postseismic deformation following the 2004 Parkfield earthquake provides an unprecedented opportunity to resolve frictional properties on the Parkfield section of the San Andreas fault. The Parkfield segment is a transition between the locked section to the southeast that last ruptured in the 1857 Fort Tejon earthquake and the creeping section to the northwest. We develop three-dimensional rate- and state-dependent friction models of afterslip following the 2004 earthquake to investigate the frictional behavior of the fault. It is assumed that the coseismic rupture occurred on an area of the fault surrounded by aseismic creep that accelerated after the earthquake. We estimate the distribution of coseismic slip, afterslip, and rate–state frictional parameters by inverting a two-step slip model. In the model we (1) estimate the coseismic slip distribution from 1-Hz Global Positioning System (GPS) data and (2) use the corresponding coseismic shear stress change on the fault as input into a numerical afterslip model governed by rate–state friction. We find the rate–state frictional parameter A– B, an indicator of frictional stability, is in the range 10^–4–10^–3 at 50 MPa normal stress, which is near the transition from potentially unstable (negative A–B) to nominally stable (positive A–B) friction. The estimate of A–B values falls within a wide range of experimental values reported for serpentinite, which crops out along the San Andreas fault zone. The critical slip distance, d_c, which characterizes the distance over which strength breaks down during a slip event, is in the range 0.01–0.1 m, consistent with seismic estimates and a fault gouge thickness of 1–10 m. The afterslip model reproduces most features observed in the GPS time-series data including high surface velocities in the first few months after the earthquake and lower rates at later times, as well as the cumulative postseismic displacement. The model tends to underpredict the displacement data at later times, suggesting that perhaps the modeled afterslip period ends too quickly or an unmodeled deformation process dominates the signal at later times.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Brenguier, M. Campillo, C. Hadziioannou, N. M. Shapiro, R. M. Nadeau, and E. Larose Postseismic Relaxation Along the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield from Continuous Seismological Observations Science, September 12, 2008; 321(5895): 1478 - 1481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. P. Allmann and P. M. Shearer A High-Frequency Secondary Event During the 2004 Parkfield Earthquake Science, November 23, 2007; 318(5854): 1279 - 1283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Savage and S.-B. Yu Postearthquake Relaxation and Aftershock Accumulation Linearly Related after the 2003 M 6.5 Chengkung, Taiwan, and the 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield, California, Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1632 - 1645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Harris and J R. Arrowsmith Introduction to the Special Issue on the 2004 Parkfield Earthquake and the Parkfield Earthquake Prediction Experiment Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S1 - S10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Liu, S. Custodio, and R. J. Archuleta Kinematic Inversion of the 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield Earthquake Including an Approximation to Site Effects Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S143 - S158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. A. Johanson, E. J. Fielding, F. Rolandone, and R. Burgmann Coseismic and Postseismic Slip of the 2004 Parkfield Earthquake from Space-Geodetic Data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S269 - S282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Langbein, J. R. Murray, and H. A. Snyder Coseismic and Initial Postseismic Deformation from the 2004 Parkfield, California, Earthquake, Observed by Global Positioning System, Electronic Distance Meter, Creepmeters, and Borehole Strainmeters Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S304 - S320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]