|
|
||||||||
1 U.S. Geological Survey
MS
977
345 Middlefield Road
Menlo Park, California
94025
langbein{at}usgs.gov
Global Positioning System (GPS), electronic distance meter, creepmeter, and strainmeter measurements spanning the M 6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake are examined. Using these data from 100 sec through 9 months following the mainshock, the Omoris law, with rate inversely related to time, 1/tp and p ranging between 0.7 and 1.3, characterizes the time-dependent deformation during the postseismic period; these results are consistent with creep models for elastic solids. With an accurate function of postseismic response, the coseismic displacements can be estimated from the high-rate, 1-min sampling GPS; and the coseismic displacements are approximately 75% of those estimated from the daily solutions. Consequently, fault-slip models using daily solutions overestimate coseismic slip. In addition, at 2 months and at 8 months following the mainshock, postseismic displacements are modeled as slip on the San Andreas fault with a lower bound on the moment exceeding that of the coseismic moment.
Online material: Data description and supplementary figures, tables, and data used in models and time-series analysis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. C. Savage and S.-B. Yu Postearthquake Relaxation and Aftershock Accumulation Linearly Related after the 2003 M 6.5 Chengkung, Taiwan, and the 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield, California, Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1632 - 1645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Lomnitz Equivalence of Tectonic Motions Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2007; 78(3): 355 - 358. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Harris and J R. Arrowsmith Introduction to the Special Issue on the 2004 Parkfield Earthquake and the Parkfield Earthquake Prediction Experiment Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S1 - S10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Rymer, J. C. Tinsley III, J. A. Treiman, J R. Arrowsmith, K. B. Clahan, A. M. Rosinski, W. A. Bryant, H. A. Snyder, G. S. Fuis, N. A. Toke, et al. Surface Fault Slip Associated with the 2004 Parkfield, California, Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S11 - S27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Simpson, M. Barall, J. Langbein, J. R. Murray, and M. J. Rymer San Andreas Fault Geometry in the Parkfield, California, Region Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S28 - S37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. S. Johnston, R. D. Borcherdt, A. T. Linde, and M. T. Gladwin Continuous Borehole Strain and Pore Pressure in the Near Field of the 28 September 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield, California, Earthquake: Implications for Nucleation, Fault Response, Earthquake Prediction, and Tremor Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S56 - S72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Liu, S. Custodio, and R. J. Archuleta Kinematic Inversion of the 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield Earthquake Including an Approximation to Site Effects Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S143 - S158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. S. Johnston, Y. Sasai, G. D. Egbert, and R. J. Mueller Seismomagnetic Effects from the Long-Awaited 28 September 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S206 - S220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Lienkaemper, B. Baker, and F. S. McFarland Surface Slip Associated with the 2004 Parkfield, California, Earthquake Measured on Alinement Arrays Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S239 - S249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. A. Johanson, E. J. Fielding, F. Rolandone, and R. Burgmann Coseismic and Postseismic Slip of the 2004 Parkfield Earthquake from Space-Geodetic Data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S269 - S282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Murray and J. Langbein Slip on the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield, California, over Two Earthquake Cycles, and the Implications for Seismic Hazard Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S283 - S303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Johnson, R. Burgmann, and K. Larson Frictional Properties on the San Andreas Fault near Parkfield, California, Inferred from Models of Afterslip following the 2004 Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S321 - S338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Toke and J R. Arrowsmith Reassessment of a Slip Budget along the Parkfield Segment of the San Andreas Fault Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S339 - S348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |