HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Krishnan, S. Articles by Tromp, J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Case Studies of Damage to Tall Steel Moment-Frame Buildings in Southern California during Large San Andreas Earthquakes

¹ Seismological Laboratory
MC 252-21
California Institute of Technology
Pasadena, California 91125
krishnan{at}caltech.edu
 (S.K., C.J., J.T.)
² Department of Geophysical Modeling and Imaging
CNRS UMR 5212 and Magique3D INRIA Futurs
University of Pau
64013 Pau Cedex, France
 (D.K.)

^* Present address: Department of Geological Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106.

On 9 January 1857, a large earthquake of magnitude 7.9 occurred on the San Andreas fault, with rupture initiating at Parkfield in central California and propagating in a southeasterly direction over a distance of more than 360 km. Such a unilateral rupture produces significant directivity toward the San Fernando and Los Angeles basins. Indeed, newspaper reports of sloshing observed in the Los Angeles river point to long-duration (1–2 min) and long-period (2–8 sec) shaking. If such an earthquake were to happen today, it could impose significant seismic demand on present-day tall buildings. Using state-of-the-art computational tools in seismology and structural engineering, validated using data from the 17 January 1994, magnitude 6.7 Northridge earthquake, we determine the damage to an existing and a new 18- story steel moment-frame building in southern California due to ground motion from two hypothetical magnitude 7.9 earthquakes on the San Andreas fault. Our study indicates that serious damage occurs in these buildings at many locations in the region in one of the two scenarios. For a north-to-south rupture scenario, the peak velocity is of the order of 1 m·sec^–1 in the Los Angeles basin, including downtown Los Angeles, and 2 m·sec^–1 in the San Fernando valley, while the peak displacements are of the order of 1 m and 2 m in the Los Angeles basin and San Fernando valley, respectively. For a south-to-north rupture scenario the peak velocities and displacements are reduced by a factor of roughly 2.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. P. Mavroeidis, B. Zhang, G. Dong, A. S. Papageorgiou, U. Dutta, and N. N. Biswas Estimation of Strong Ground Motion from the Great 1964 Mw 9.2 Prince William Sound, Alaska, Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2008; 98(5): 2303 - 2324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. B. Olsen, S. M. Day, J. B. Minster, Y. Cui, A. Chourasia, D. Okaya, P. Maechling, and T. Jordan TeraShake2: Spontaneous Rupture Simulations of Mw 7.7 Earthquakes on the Southern San Andreas Fault Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1162 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. H. Olsen, B. T. Aagaard, and T. H. Heaton Long-Period Building Response to Earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay Area Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 1047 - 1065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Ma, R. J. Archuleta, and M. T. Page Effects of Large-Scale Surface Topography on Ground Motions, as Demonstrated by a Study of the San Gabriel Mountains, Los Angeles, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 2066 - 2079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]