| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 U.S. Geological Survey, MS 977
345
Middlefield Road
Menlo Park, California
94025
boore{at}usgs.gov
(D.M.B.)
2 Department of Civil and Envrionmental
Engineering
University of California at Berkeley
Berkeley, California
94720
jenniewl{at}ce.berkeley.edu
(J.W.-L.)
3 Pacific Gas & Electric
245
Market Street
San Francisco, California
94129
naa2{at}pge.com
(N.A.A.)
The geometric mean of the response spectra for two orthogonal horizontal components of motion, commonly used as the response variable in predictions of strong ground motion, depends on the orientation of the sensors as installed in the field. This means that the measure of ground-motion intensity could differ for the same actual ground motion. This dependence on sensor orientation is most pronounced for strongly correlated motion (the extreme example being linearly polarized motion), such as often occurs at periods of 1 sec or longer. We propose two new measures of the geometric mean, GMRotDpp, and GMRotIpp, that are independent of the sensor orientations. Both are based on a set of geometric means computed from the as-recorded orthogonal horizontal motions rotated through all possible nonredundant rotation angles. GMRotDpp is determined as the ppth percentile of the set of geometric means for a given oscillator period. For example, GMRotD00, GMRotD50, and GMRotD100 correspond to the minimum, median, and maximum values, respectively. The rotations that lead to GMRotDpp depend on period, whereas a single-period-independent rotation is used for GMRotIpp, the angle being chosen to minimize the spread of the rotation-dependent geometric mean (normalized by GMRotDpp) over the usable range of oscillator periods. GMRotI50 is the ground- motion intensity measure being used in the development of new ground-motion prediction equations by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center Next Generation Attenuation project.
Comparisons with as-recorded geometric means for a large dataset show that the new measures are systematically larger than the geometric-mean response spectra using the as-recorded values of ground acceleration, but only by a small amount (less than 3%). The theoretical advantage of the new measures is that they remove sensor orientation as a contributor to aleatory uncertainty. Whether the reduction is of practical significance awaits detailed studies of large datasets. A preliminary analysis contained in a companion article by Beyer and Bommer finds that the reduction is small-to-nonexistent for equations based on a wide range of magnitudes and distances. The results of Beyer and Bommer do suggest, however, that there is an increasing reduction as period increases. Whether the reduction increases with other subdivisions of the dataset for which strongly correlated motions might be expected (e.g., pulselike motions close to faults) awaits further analysis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Akkar and E. Yenier Assessment of Point-Source Stochastic Simulations Using Recently Derived Ground-Motion Prediction Equations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2009; 99(6): 3172 - 3191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Bommer, P. J. Stafford, and J. E. Alarcon Empirical Equations for the Prediction of the Significant, Bracketed, and Uniform Duration of Earthquake Ground Motion Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2009; 99(6): 3217 - 3233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Delavaud, F. Scherbaum, N. Kuehn, and C. Riggelsen Information-Theoretic Selection of Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Seismic Hazard Analysis: An Applicability Study Using Californian Data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2009; 99(6): 3248 - 3263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Ameri, M. Massa, D. Bindi, E. D'Alema, A. Gorini, L. Luzi, S. Marzorati, F. Pacor, R. Paolucci, R. Puglia, et al. The 6 April 2009 Mw 6.3 L'Aquila (Central Italy) Earthquake: Strong-motion Observations Seismological Research Letters, November 1, 2009; 80(6): 951 - 966. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Scasserra, J. P. Stewart, P. Bazzurro, G. Lanzo, and F. Mollaioli A Comparison of NGA Ground-Motion Prediction Equations to Italian Data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2009; 99(5): 2961 - 2978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. M. Kuehn, F. Scherbaum, and C. Riggelsen Deriving Empirical Ground-Motion Models: Balancing Data Constraints and Physical Assumptions to Optimize Prediction Capability Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2009; 99(4): 2335 - 2347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Frankel A Constant Stress-Drop Model for Producing Broadband Synthetic Seismograms: Comparison with the Next Generation Attenuation Relations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2009; 99(2A): 664 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. O. Strasser, N. A. Abrahamson, and J. J. Bommer Sigma: Issues, Insights, and Challenges Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 40 - 56. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Jayaram and J. W. Baker Statistical Tests of the Joint Distribution of Spectral Acceleration Values Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2008; 98(5): 2231 - 2243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Ripperger, P. M. Mai, and J.-P. Ampuero Variability of Near-Field Ground Motion from Dynamic Earthquake Rupture Simulations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1207 - 1228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Massa, P. Morasca, L. Moratto, S. Marzorati, G. Costa, and D. Spallarossa Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Northern Italy Using Weak- and Strong-Motion Amplitudes, Frequency Content, and Duration Parameters Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1319 - 1342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. Stafford Conditional Prediction of Absolute Durations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1588 - 1594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Watson-Lamprey and D. M. Boore Beyond SaGMRotI: Conversion to SaArb, SaSN, and SaMaxRot Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1511 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. P. Hong and K. Goda Orientation-Dependent Ground-Motion Measure for Seismic-Hazard Assessment Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1525 - 1538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Akkar and J. J. Bommer Empirical Prediction Equations for Peak Ground Velocity Derived from Strong-Motion Records from Europe and the Middle East Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2007; 97(2): 511 - 530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Beyer and J. J. Bommer Relationships between Median Values and between Aleatory Variabilities for Different Definitions of the Horizontal Component of Motion Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2006; 96(4A): 1512 - 1522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
