Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 2006; v. 96; no. 4A; p. 1332-1343; DOI: 10.1785/0120050261
© 2006 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pacheco, J. Fco.
Right arrow Articles by González, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The Mw 6.4 Damas, Costa Rica, Earthquake of 20 November 2004: Aftershocks and Slip Distribution

Javier Fco. Pacheco1, Ronnie Quintero2, Floribeth Vega2, Juan Segura2, Walter Jiménez2 and Víctor González2

1 Instituto de Geofisica
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán
CP 04510, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico
javier{at}ollin.igeofcu.unam.mx
 (J.F.P.)
2 Observatorio Vulcanológico y Sismológico de Costa Rica
Universidad Nacional
Heredia, Costa Rica 86-3000
 (J.F.P., R.O., F.V., J.S., W.J., V.G.)

The earthquake of 20 November 2004 was located north of Damas Island in the Pacific coast of Costa Rica, within the Costa Rica Deformed Belt. The earthquake was located at 24 km depth and reported with a magnitude (Mw) of 6.4 and a strike-slip mechanism with a large normal dip-slip motion. This mechanism agrees with mapped faults in the area that suggest transtensional deformation on the forearc and the entire western boundary of the Panama microplate. Aftershock locations do not delineate a preferable plane to distinguish between the two nodal planes and are distributed between 15 and 25 km depth. The slip distribution during the mainshock, modeled after teleseismic and local data, pictured a circular rupture 8 km in radius and 0.25 m of average displacement. The fault plane cannot be distinguished from the two nodal planes from the slip distribution because of the lack of directivity and resolution for this magnitude earthquake. Weak evidence from empirical Green’s function analysis suggests that the dextral northwest-oriented fault could be the causative fault. Depth to the top of the slab, hypocenter location of the mainshock, its slip distribution, depth distribution of the aftershocks, and Quaternary fault activity at the surface suggest that deformation takes place throughout the whole thickness of the crust. This extended deformation might be caused by seamount subduction and strong basal friction on the upper plate, due to subduction of a thick, young, and buoyant oceanic plate, rough seafloor, and underplating of large seamounts.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
P. B. Sak, D. M. Fisher, T. W. Gardner, J. S. Marshall, and P. C. LaFemina
Rough crust subduction, forearc kinematics, and Quaternary uplift rates, Costa Rican segment of the Middle American Trench
Geological Society of America Bulletin, June 1, 2009; 121(7-8): 992 - 1012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Seismological Society of America.