Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2006; v. 96; no. 3; p. 757-795; DOI: 10.1785/0120050191
© 2006 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, K.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Predicting the 1975 Haicheng Earthquake

Kelin Wang1, Qi-Fu Chen2, Shihong Sun3 and Andong Wang4

1 Geological Survey of Canada
9860 West Saanich Road
Sidney, British Columbia, Canada
kwang{at}nrcan.gc.ca
 (K.W.)
2 Institute of Earthquake Science
China Earthquake Administration
63 Fuxing Avenue
Beijing 100036, People’s Republic of China
chenqf{at}seis.ac.cn
 (Q.-F.C.)
3 China Earthquake Networks Center
China Earthquake Administration
Beijing, People’s Republic of China
 (S.S.)
4 Liaoning Province Earthquake Administration
Shenyang, People’s Republic of China
 (A.W.)

The publicized four-stage (long-term, middle-term, short-term, and imminent) prediction of the M 7.3 1975 Haicheng, China, earthquake once generated worldwide fascination. Yet the prediction process has remained mysterious because of lack of reports on real-time documentation and details of how warnings were issued. In the present work, study of declassified Chinese documents and interviews of key witnesses have allowed us to reconstruct this important history. Our findings indicate that there were two official middle-term predictions but no official short- term prediction. On the day of the earthquake, a county government issued a specific evacuation order, and actual actions taken by provincial scientists and government officials also effectively constituted an imminent prediction. These efforts saved thousands of lives, but the local construction style and time of the earthquake also contributed to minimizing fatalities. Evacuation was extremely uneven across the disaster region, and critical decisions were often made at very local levels. The most important precursor was a foreshock sequence, but other anomalies such as geodetic deformation, changes in groundwater level, color, and chemistry, and peculiar animal behavior also played a role.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
A. J. Michael
BSSA: Worth Thinking About
Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2009; 80(3): 405 - 408.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. Stroujkova
Constraining Event Depths and Crustal Velocities Using Regional Depth Phases
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2009; 99(1): 215 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Seismological Society of America.