|
|
||||||||
1 Geological Survey of Canada
9860
West Saanich Road
Sidney, British Columbia,
Canada
kwang{at}nrcan.gc.ca
(K.W.)
2 Institute of Earthquake
Science
China Earthquake Administration
63 Fuxing Avenue
Beijing
100036, Peoples Republic of
China
chenqf{at}seis.ac.cn
(Q.-F.C.)
3 China Earthquake Networks
Center
China Earthquake Administration
Beijing, Peoples Republic of
China
(S.S.)
4 Liaoning Province Earthquake
Administration
Shenyang, Peoples Republic of
China
(A.W.)
The publicized four-stage (long-term, middle-term, short-term, and imminent) prediction of the M 7.3 1975 Haicheng, China, earthquake once generated worldwide fascination. Yet the prediction process has remained mysterious because of lack of reports on real-time documentation and details of how warnings were issued. In the present work, study of declassified Chinese documents and interviews of key witnesses have allowed us to reconstruct this important history. Our findings indicate that there were two official middle-term predictions but no official short- term prediction. On the day of the earthquake, a county government issued a specific evacuation order, and actual actions taken by provincial scientists and government officials also effectively constituted an imminent prediction. These efforts saved thousands of lives, but the local construction style and time of the earthquake also contributed to minimizing fatalities. Evacuation was extremely uneven across the disaster region, and critical decisions were often made at very local levels. The most important precursor was a foreshock sequence, but other anomalies such as geodetic deformation, changes in groundwater level, color, and chemistry, and peculiar animal behavior also played a role.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |