| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Article |
2.8) in Western Quebec, Southern Ontario, and Northern New York
1 Department of Earth
Sciences
University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario, N6A 5B7,
Canada
sma44{at}uwo.ca
(S.M.)
2 Department of Earth
Sciences
Carleton University
Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 5B6,
Canada
gmatkinson{at}aol.com
(G.M.A.)
Regional depth phase modeling is a useful technique to constrain earthquake
focal depths for events within sparse networks. We demonstrate how regional
depth phases can be used to obtain focal depths for hundreds of earthquakes with
mN 
2.8 that occurred from 1980 to 2004 in southern
Ontario, western Quebec, and northern New York State. We discuss the development
of regional depth phases with distance, their use in focal depth determinations
by matching waveforms to synthetics, and possible sources of error. In general,
focal depths can be determined to within about 3 km when there is at least one
record at regional distances with clearly identifiable depth phases such as
sPmP or sPg.
In southwestern Ontario and northern New York, focal depths range from 2 to 15 km. In areas of western Quebec and along the Ottawa River valley in Ontario, focal depths range from 2 to 25 km. More than half of the earthquakes in a cluster of activity near Maniwaki in western Quebec are deeper than 20 km. All earthquakes deeper than 20 km occurred north of about 45.3° N.
There is an intriguing tendency for earthquake depths to cluster near 8 km, 12 km, 15 km, and 22 km. Another interesting observation is that there are several earthquake pairs or small groups with very similar epicenters but quite different depths. The most active regions, in western Quebec and along the Ottawa River valley, tend to exhibit a relatively wide range of focal depths along broad zones that trend roughly northwest, suggesting that seismicity is occurring along diffuse northwest-trending faults throughout the crust. The wide range of focal depths may indicate the potential for a larger maximum scale of fault rupture and serve as a contemporary marker of locations where large events have occurred in the recent geologic past.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Dineva and D. W. Eaton Reply to "Comment on 'The October 2005 Georgian Bay, Canada, Earthquake Sequence: Mafic Dykes and Their Role in the Mechanical Heterogeneity of Precambrian Crust' by S. Dineva, D. Eaton, S. Ma, and R. Mereu" by G. Ranalli and M. Lamontagne Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2010; 100(1): 406 - 407. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Ma and D. W. Eaton Anatomy of a Small Earthquake Swarm in Southern Ontario, Canada Seismological Research Letters, March 1, 2009; 80(2): 214 - 223. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Ma, D. W. Eaton, and J. Adams Intraplate Seismicity of a Recently Deglaciated Shield Terrane: A Case Study from Northern Ontario, Canada Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2008; 98(6): 2828 - 2848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. M. Atkinson, S. I. Kaka, D. Eaton, A. Bent, V. Peci, and S. Halchuk A Very Close Look at a Moderate Earthquake near Sudbury, Ontario Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2008; 79(1): 119 - 131. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Dineva, D. Eaton, S. Ma, and R. Mereu The October 2005 Georgian Bay, Canada, Earthquake Sequence: Mafic Dykes and Their Role in the Mechanical Heterogeneity of Precambrian Crust Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2007; 97(2): 457 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. M. Atkinson and D. M. Boore Earthquake Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2181 - 2205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
