Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 2006; v. 96; no. 1; p. 334-343; DOI: 10.1785/0120050048
© 2006 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tibuleac, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Britton, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Short Note

An Automated Short-Period Surface-Wave Detection Algorithm

Ileana M. Tibuleac1 and James M. Britton1

1 Weston Geophysical Corporation
181 Bedford Street, Suite 1
Lexington, Massachusetts 02420
ileana{at}westongeophysical.com
brittonj{at}westongeophysical.com

We describe an automated short-period Rayleigh wave (Rg) detector designed to work on local (<2.5° epicentral distance) events recorded at three- component stations. The detector was modeled after an automatic 17- to 22-sec Rayleigh-wave detection method; however, we have modified the algorithms for local distance and short-period applications. We have tested the detector on a well-located cluster of mining events from central India and on a set of ground-truth events in the area. The Rg detector was also integrated into a semiautomatic event detection and location algorithm and applied on continuous data. Fourier and wavelet-based methods are evaluated for prefiltering. We observe that sample standard deviations of backazimuth estimates using the Rg detector, after wavelet prefiltering, are comparable to fk3C P backazimuth estimates from event clusters. Our results indicate that using the Rg-phase backazimuths for event location is a promising alternative to using small signal-to-noise ratio first-arrival backazimuths. We recommend wavelet prefiltering versus Fourier prefiltering because it is more consistent for the detection of low signal-to-noise ratio events at local distances.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Seismological Society of America.