HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pancha, A. Articles by Kreemer, C. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Comparison of Seismic and Geodetic Scalar Moment Rates across the Basin and Range Province

¹ Seismological Laboratory and Department of Geological Sciences
University of Nevada
Reno, Nevada 89557
pancha{at}seismo.unr.edu
jga{at}unr.edu
 (A.P., J.G.A.)

² Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology
Mail Stop 178
University of Nevada
Reno, Nevada 89557-0088
kreemer{at}unr.edu
 (C.K.)

Scalar moment rates estimated from a 146-year seismicity catalog agree, within uncertainties, with the deformation rate of the Basin and Range province determined by using space geodesy. Seismic-moment rates have been estimated from a new catalog of earthquakes complete for M 5. The catalog was compiled from 15 preexisting catalogs, supplemented by the review of 44 journal articles. Throughout the catalog compilation, care was taken to obtain the moment magnitude or a reasonable, and not inflated, equivalent. Seventy-six percent of the moment release occurred during 10 earthquakes of magnitude M_W 6.79. The spatial distribution of earthquakes and their moment release matches the geodetic pattern of deformation. All three are concentrated in a 200-km-wide zone along the western boundary of the Great Basin, with this zone widening to the north. Several techniques, ultimately traceable to Kostrov and Brune, are used to translate the geodetic strain rates into rates of seismic-moment release. The agreement between geodetic and seismic- moment rate suggests that, within uncertainties, the rate of historic earthquakes within the Basin and Range province, taken as a whole, provides a reasonable estimate for the future rate of seismicity. These results support the hypothesis that even a few years of detailed geodetic monitoring can provide a good constraint on earthquake occurrence rate estimates for large-enough regions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. G. Anderson, I. Tibuleac, A. Anooshehpoor, G. Biasi, K. Smith, and D. von Seggern Exceptional Ground Motions Recorded during the 26 April 2008 Mw 5.0 Earthquake in Mogul, Nevada Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2009; 99(6): 3475 - 3486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. H. von Seggern, K. D. Smith, and L. A. Preston Seismic Spatial-Temporal Character and Effects of a Deep (25-30 km) Magma Intrusion below North Lake Tahoe, California-Nevada Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1508 - 1526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Stein Approaches to continental intraplate earthquake issues Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 425(0): 1 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Anderson and Y. Miyata Ranking States by Seismic Activity Seismological Research Letters, November 1, 2006; 77(6): 672 - 676. [Full Text] [PDF]