Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 2005; v. 95; no. 6; p. 2517-2524; DOI: 10.1785/0120050043
© 2005 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, C.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Short Note

Revised ML Determination for Crustal Earthquakes in Taiwan

Yih-Min Wu1, Richard M. Allen2 and Chien-Fu Wu3

1 Department of Geosciences
National Taiwan University
Taipei, Taiwan
drymwu{at}ntu.edu.tw
 (Y.-M.W.)

2 University of California Berkeley
Berkeley, California
 (R.M.A.)

3 Central Weather Bureau
Taiwan
 (C.-F.W.)

The local magnitude scale ML is an empirically derived scale anchored to a zero magnitude reference event. Richter defined the amplitude of ground shaking at an epicentral distance of 100 km for a zero magnitude earthquake in southern California. The crustal attenuation characteristics of Taiwan result in a relatively high ML when compared to moment magnitude, Mw. We therefore define a revised ML scale for crustal earthquakes in the Taiwan region that is more consistent with Mw. Using observed peak ground shaking and Mw, we determine a new log A0 curve of ground shaking versus hypocentral distance, R, for a zero magnitude earthquake, and station correction factors. The log A0 curve determined in this study is,


{05043-deq001}

(001)
Using this new log A0 curve and station corrections, the new ML is more consistent with Mw, with a 0.2 magnitude unit uncertainty. The new log A0 curve has a value of –2.80 at the distance of 100 km compared to the anchor point of log A0 = –3 at the same distance as defined by Richter for southern California. This means that the current ML estimates in Taiwan (which use Richter’s definition) average 0.2 magnitude units larger than their Mw. The station correction factors also determined are large, from –0.40 to 0.52 magnitude units. The use of station corrections in routine seismic network operation in Taiwan will improve magnitude estimates. This is particularly important for smaller events when recording stations may be predominantly on either hard rock or soft soil sites, which could lead to under- or overestimates of the magnitude by up to half a magnitude unit.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Y.-M. Wu, C.-H. Chang, L. Zhao, T.-L. Teng, and M. Nakamura
A Comprehensive Relocation of Earthquakes in Taiwan from 1991 to 2005
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1471 - 1481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C.-H. Chang, Y.-M. Wu, L. Zhao, and F. T. Wu
Aftershocks of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake: The First Hour
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2007; 97(4): 1245 - 1258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Seismological Society of America.