|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Civil, Structural and
Environmental Engineering
University at Buffalo, State University of New
York
212 Ketter Hall
Buffalo, New York 14260
(B.H.)
2 Department of Civil
Engineering
University of Patras
Rio, 26500 Patras,
Greece
(A.S.P)
The specific barrier model, proposed and developed by
Papageorgiou and Aki (1983a, b;
1985) provides
the most complete, yet parsimonious, self-consistent description of the faulting
process. It applies both in the "near-fault" and in the
"far-field" region, thus allowing for consistent ground-motion
simulations over the entire frequency range and for all distances of engineering
interest. The model has been implemented in the stochastic method and calibrated
with extended databases of response spectral amplitudes from earthquakes of
intraplate regions (mainly eastern North America events), interplate regions,
and regions of tectonic extension
(Spudich et al., 1999,
database). The ensemble average value of a key parameter of the specific barrier
model, the local stress drop 
L, is
161
bars for interplate earthquakes,
114 bars for extensional regime
earthquakes, and
180 bars for intraplate earthquakes. The high-frequency
source spectral levels of interplate and extensional regime earthquakes deviate
significantly from self-similar scaling. The deviation is most likely caused by
the "effective" source area and/or irregularities in the rupture
kinematics. We account for their overall effects through a high-frequency source
complexity factor,
, in the source spectrum of the specific
barrier model. As a result, inter- and intraplate source spectra show similar
high-frequency levels at moderate magnitudes but intraplate earthquakes have
higher spectral levels at the larger magnitudes. The interplate soil residuals
show clear signs of nonlinear site response, whereas only slight signs of such
nonlinearity are observed for the extensional dataset. The regional models
calibrated in this study are in reasonably good agreement with other regional
attenuation relationships and provide a reliable and physically realistic, yet
computationally efficient, way to model strong ground motions with implications
for seismic hazard and risk analysis.
Online material: Strong-motion station and event-station pair information.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Parolai, D. Bindi, E. Durukal, H. Grosser, and C. Milkereit Source Parameters and Seismic Moment-Magnitude Scaling for Northwestern Turkey Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2007; 97(2): 655 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |