Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2005; v. 95; no. 2; p. 512-520; DOI: 10.1785/0120030223
© 2005 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chung, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Crustal Formula in South Korea Using the Source Pair/Receiver Pair Method

Tae Woong Chung1, Yun Kyong Park2, Ik Bom Kang2 and Kiehwa Lee3

1 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences
Sejong University
Seoul 143-747, South Korea
 (T.W.C.)

2 Division of Geological and Environmental Hazards
Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources
Daejeon 305-350, South Korea
 (Y.K.P., I.B.K.)

3 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences
Seoul National University
Seoul 151-742, South Korea
 (K.L.)

Formula has been studied extensively because its regional variations reflect geological structure: values around 1 Hz show close correlation with tectonic seismicity. We analyze Formula in South Korea by applying the source pair/receiver pair (SPRP) method to 39 Korean earthquakes and 32 far-regional earthquakes. We obtain nearly 1500 source-receiver pairs with the combined difference of epicentral distance, D, ranging from 16 to 657 km. Seismograms are filtered by using an eight-pole bandpass Butterworth filter with five-center frequencies. 0.375, 0.75, 1.5, 3, and 6 Hz. The obtained Formula for all frequencies are less than 0.002, which is a reasonable value for a seismically inactive region. In spite of the short range of D, the results of the SPRP method show reliable values, especially at 1.5 and 3 Hz.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. R. Ford, D. S. Dreger, K. Mayeda, W. R. Walter, L. Malagnini, and W. S. Phillips
Regional Attenuation in Northern California: A Comparison of Five 1D Q Methods
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 2033 - 2046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. W. Chung, M.-H. Noh, J.-K. Kim, Y.-K. Park, H.-J. Yoo, and J. M. Lees
A Study of the Regional Variation of Low-Frequency around the Korean Peninsula
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 2190 - 2197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. Yun, W. S. Lee, K. Lee, and M. H. Noh
Spatial Distribution of Coda Q in South Korea
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2007; 97(3): 1012 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Seismological Society of America.