Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2005; v. 95; no. 2; p. 401-407; DOI: 10.1785/0120040034
© 2005 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richards, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, W.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Equivalent Volume Sources for Explosions at Depth: Theory and Observations

Paul G. Richards1,2 and Won-Young Kim1

1 Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University
Palisades, New York 10964
 (P.G.R., W.-Y.K.)

2 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University
New York, New York
 (P.G.R.)

For simple theoretical models of an underground explosion, two apparently different relationships between isotropic moment and volume change have been published. We show that there is no inconsistency, because these relationships are based on two different definitions of volume change at the explosion source. We report observations of three 25-ton chemical explosions conducted in 1997 at the former nuclear test site near Semipalatinsk, Kazakhstan. These show the theoretically predicted decrease of signal strength as the shot depth increases. We argue that the relationship between isotropic moment and volume change proposed by Müller (1973) is preferred.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Seismological Society of America.